Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg, Netherlands
quote:
Originally posted by Mattinsanity
I was about to make a nice comeback to this but whatever, you win ok sweetcheeks?
and I am Psynon LOL. the great -MB is spot on.
Ha, ha, I went to bed yesterday, but thought in this reply I wanted to say that this is the point that some here would start to call me names or really get pissed for not stopping.
I wanted to say, as that was still an option:
Psynon = Mattinsanity = Euforix
Well, no need for that any more, but I had my fun
___________________
Longest (classic) Trance playlist on YouTube (5000 tracks released up to and including 1997), click here
Oct-17-2011 19:07
Mattsanity.
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto
quote:
Originally posted by Trance-MB
Ha, ha, I went to bed yesterday, but thought in this reply I wanted to say that this is the point that some here would start to call me names or really get pissed for not stopping.
I wanted to say, as that was still an option:
Psynon = Mattinsanity = Euforix
Well, no need for that any more, but I had my fun
maybe I should've added after I said spot on.
I read another thread during the Holden/Chable era and this is what someone said:
"Progressive House = Progressive
Progressive Trance = Trance
Progressive Trance isnt really Progressive..... what u guys think of progressive trance is just strictly trance with slight touch of progressive"
couldn't have said it better myself.
Oct-18-2011 00:59
srussell0018
Chaostician
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Blumsberg
Who fucking cares?
Oct-18-2011 01:00
Mattsanity.
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto
come on. this whole genre labelling bullshit is a good icebreaker. and it's good to know progressive house and its carbon copy progressive trance were being debated back in the day.
Oct-18-2011 01:25
lollipoptian
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Oct 2011
Location: USA
Like exposure to new things, learn new knowledge.I am also wish making more friends.
Originally posted by Mattinsanity
Oh my goodness. this is deja vu all over for me.
I am not surprised that users with barely more than a year or two of live experience listening to trance music posting in threads back in 2003 and 2002 questioned the existence of a genre of music that peaked in 1997.
The aggressive turnover rate in this scene, in combination with its utter lack of a sense of history, is actually one of the prime motivations that compelled me to make the guides.
Originally posted by Ishkur
Now seriously, go away.
Oct-18-2011 07:25
SYSTEM-J
IDKFA.
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Manchester
Matt, you don't know what "progressive" means, you don't know what "progressive trance" is and you aren't actually making any kind of argument, you're just quoting morons from a decade ago.
Originally posted by Ishkur
I am not surprised that users with barely more than a year or two of live experience listening to trance music posting in threads back in 2003 and 2002 questioned the existence of a genre of music that peaked in 1997.
The aggressive turnover rate in this scene, in combination with its utter lack of a sense of history, is actually one of the prime motivations that compelled me to make the guides.
progressive trance:
Now seriously, go away.
I doubt you're serious on your best day considering how you've returned to this site for literally a few seconds with no dirt on anybody. plus, your guide is famous for being brilliantly humorous and satire, seriousness being irrelevant. while you had haters throwing your guide into the toilet and doing #2, I always thought it was excellent since I was a young buck.
I thought you were going to hand the final knockout punch by posting for instance, a marc mitchell joint, but the evolution remix of life in minds? that's the best example you can come up with? sure they're classified as "progressive trance" but that track specifically does not sound progressive at all. is it just me or does that sound like hard trance?
whatever though, I'll just give you the benefit of the doubt by saying you're probably a decade older than me, and that you were probably clubbing when I was sucking on my mother's nipples. I made this thread simply because they were debating about progressive trance's existence in 2002 and 03, not because I want to make shit up and troll.
but straight up, your 2nd example was shit.
anyway, you win. progressive trance exists. there's no use in trying to defend my belief that it's fake since I'm clearly outnumbered and outgunned. if you wanna get the last word in this thread before it gets locked or something, I don't give a fuck.
Oct-18-2011 10:52
Bierheld
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2010
Location: Utrecht, Netherlands
Next time you open a thread like this you might want to try to... I dunno, formulate an argument? Leave some room for discussion?