 |
|
|
|
 |
Schadenfreude
Bird is the word.

Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa- Pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-ooma-mow-
|
|
|
Jan-29-2010 20:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
Moongoose
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Celje, Slovenia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
What don't I get? See... this is the type of elitism that is so damaging. The American people are just too dumb to know what's best for them, right? It takes real intellectuals like Obama (and you based on how I'm reading this) to show them the way. Because, if they could only grasp the concepts as you brianiacs do, they'd understand. Injecting money into the economy that has just been siphoned from the economy is not how to create jobs. Legislation's not the probelm, the slow mind of the citizen is. Right? What you don't get, because you clearly have no actual business experience, is that anyone who successfully starts a business, and creates jobs through rising profits, will quickly become a member of the evil $250K Club. Offering an $8000 tax break so a business owner will spend $40K to hire a new employee isn't how it works, chief. The financial speculation he rails against provides the investment capital for those small businesses and entrepreneurs. If no one has incentives to excel, and risk-taking becomes punished, small businesses won't appear and grow. |
In general people dont know whats best for them, not just americans. And sadly (for you) yes, it takes intelectuals, smart people, educated people, elite if you want to call them that to make the right calls for the rest of them. I dont want a plumber in charge of the economy, i want someone who knows whats going on. The plumbers common sense of whats best wont work very well when its time to make a choice that will effect a mass of people.
On to the second point if i remember the debate correctly that 250k that youre so upset about is not the amount of money that the business brings in but the amount you yourself earn. And if i would agree that taxing a business that brings in more than 250k a year would be ridiculous taxing an individual who brings in more than 250 a year is perfectly reasonable. Also youre not making sense further on as well but ill touch on that tomorrow since im to sleepy to correctly understand what youre actually on about.
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
Total disconnect from reality here. You are like the grad student who got an A on a term paper, but doesn't understand how it's real world application doesn't work... but still believes that if I just pay attention to your footnotes I'll get it. Obama has had a horrible first year. His approval has sunk to the lowest percentage of any president after the first year (now 46% in last week's CBS poll), and a staggering -22% differential in approve vs. disapprove from when he was elected. Every one of his major agenda items lacks a majority support. Did you not just see what happened in Massachusetts? New Jersey? Virginia? |
How about republicans loosing a seat that hasnt been held by a democrat since the civil war...that has got to hurt and has to mean something as well. And everyone of his agendas lacks majority support? Seriously? Because i could name a few that are very popular.
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
No, he's squandering momentum by co-opting legislation crafting to radicals Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. And, by forcing moderate members of his own party to vote with him when their constituents back home don't support the agenda items. It's funny to hear you say Republicans don't give 2 shits about health care; they have had several proposals rebuffed and not even considered, after Obama assured them he'd consider all ideas. People aren't even seeing the fucking bills to make a decision on, until Reid tosses them out there to be voted on at 2:00 a.m. on a Saturday. What YOU don't get is that everyone from Rebublicans, Independants, and Democrats want reform... but not the kind that is being presented. But you're whole premise is that what's being offered is the best (why?) and to disagree with that equates to "not giving 2 shits". Please. |
Seriously, lay off the drugs. Peslosi and Reid radicals? What have they done that is remotely radical? On their best of days they are at most centre left. Its a shame to see that such a shift has occurred in american politics that ideas that barely qualify as liberal everywhere else get qualified as radical in the us.
And yes the republicans had several "brilliant" proposals for healthcare. They proposed everything that they could that would increase profits for the health insurance companies, never really gave a thought about making it more available or more affordable to the general public. Vote on the bill at 2am... that's what you get for delaying the bill by any means available (everyone remember the leaked memo on how to stall the bill).
And yes people dont like whats being presented now...they did like what was being presented in the beginning though...before it was butchered and watered down to appease the republicans for some hope of bipartisanship. Which was doomed to fail from the beginning anyway...the dems should know by now that thats not the game the republicans play
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
Can purchase, or will be FORCED to purchase, otherwise face massive fines and/or jail time? Let's not mince words. Yeah his political capital is so considerable, he couldn't sway Massachusetts voters who are registered as Democrats 3.5 to 1 to keep a Democrat in Kennedy's seat. He's 0-4 now in using his political capital to sway (Mass., VA, NJ, Olympics). Governing against the will of the people will finish off the little political capital he has left. Dude, you are so entrenched in your Beltway cocoon it's scary. |
Forced...interesting you bring that up...if i remember correctly the necessity to purchase and fines if you dont was something strongly advocated by the health insurance companies and therefore only put in in some vague hopes that it would mean a republican vote. I cant blame the republicans solely on this one as the dems should have had some balls to say no, but you cant go past the facts that it was something the republicans were happy about when it got in the bill.
___________________
|
|
Jan-29-2010 21:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
djnitride
Tiesto played my record

Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
Total disconnect from reality here. You are like the grad student who got an A on a term paper, but doesn't understand how it's real world application doesn't work... but still believes that if I just pay attention to your footnotes I'll get it. Obama has had a horrible first year. His approval has sunk to the lowest percentage of any president after the first year (now 46% in last week's CBS poll), and a staggering -22% differential in approve vs. disapprove from when he was elected. Every one of his major agenda items lacks a majority support. Did you not just see what happened in Massachusetts? New Jersey? Virginia?
|
LOL, you fucking nailed it.
You are a fucking lunatic if you think Obama had a good first year... the bailouts, the debt, the total disregard for EVERYTHING important to our nation....
And his approval ratings tell the rest of the story, grad student! Time to go outside, to the REAL WORLD, where its practice, not theory that matters.
Honestly I could give 10 shits about the democrats or republicans, they have both screwed us so bad that we are going down the drain because these days, NO ONE GIVES A FLYING FUCK about integrity in politics, they just want "tax cuts" or "welfare".
|
|
Jan-29-2010 21:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
Joss Weatherby
Banned

Registered: May 2008
Location: The Pacific Northwest, of course
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by djnitride
LOL, you fucking nailed it.
You are a fucking lunatic if you think Obama had a good first year... the bailouts, the debt, the total disregard for EVERYTHING important to our nation....
And his approval ratings tell the rest of the story, grad student! Time to go outside, to the REAL WORLD, where its practice, not theory that matters. |
Hey Asshat the biggest bail outs were at the END of the Bush administration.
You realize the president does NOT implement policy, he can only suggest and work on getting things done.
Blame Congress, the Presidents intentions are solid.
|
|
Jan-29-2010 21:59
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Joss Weatherby
Banned

Registered: May 2008
Location: The Pacific Northwest, of course
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by djnitride
Your idea of getting something done:
spending like an asshat till we drown in debt. Yeah, sounds great |
Thats both sides ideas. At least the Democrats want to make up for some of it by raising taxes on those who can afford it.
REMEMBER PEOPLE TAXES ARE GOOD. IT PAYS FOR POLICE, THE MILITARY, FEDERAL INVESTIGATIVE AGENCIES, LIBRARIES, AND EDUCATION!
But yea, thats not my idea.
My idea is the most beautiful and self-sustainable part of the country get itself its own country.
I support Texas leaving too, let them become a christian caliphate, they already got the deserts, might as well act just like them muslims they hate so much. They all pray to the same god anways.
|
|
Jan-29-2010 22:10
|
|
|
 |
 |
djnitride
Tiesto played my record

Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Thats both sides ideas. At least the Democrats want to make up for some of it by raising taxes on those who can afford it.
REMEMBER PEOPLE TAXES ARE GOOD. IT PAYS FOR POLICE, THE MILITARY, FEDERAL INVESTIGATIVE AGENCIES, LIBRARIES, AND EDUCATION!
But yea, thats not my idea.
My idea is the most beautiful and self-sustainable part of the country get itself its own country.
I support Texas leaving too, let them become a christian caliphate, they already got the deserts, might as well act just like them muslims they hate so much. They all pray to the same god anways. |
We will be back, we will crusade through California and torture all the vile hippies and drug fiends! Praise jesus!!!!!! we will pour barrels of oil on you and sacrifice you to the almighty!
But slander aside, the democrats spend more than the republicans to create deficit and raise taxes, and the republicans spend a bit less but also cut taxes.
WHY CANT ANY PARTY JUST RAISE TAXES AND CUT SPENDING??? The solution is not that difficult to comprehend.
|
|
Jan-29-2010 22:14
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|