But if you're taking the 1800s biological textbook/Fledz approach, if a woman makes it to 55 before dying, she has already surpassed her fruitful days and can no longer bear children, so why might her health or appearance matter at that point? If anything, she is saving future children from the debt it takes to facilitate the ensurance of life after 55. Diabetics are quite responsible human beings, really.
Jun-16-2011 18:26
nefardec
Tranceaddict in tranning
Registered: Oct 2004
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
But if you're taking the 1800s biological textbook/Fledz approach, if a woman makes it to 55 before dying, she has already surpassed her fruitful days and can no longer bear children, so why might her health or appearance matter at that point? If anything, she is saving future children from the debt it takes to facilitate the ensurance of life after 55. Diabetics are quite responsible human beings, really.
to be truly responsible we should have a moratorium on having kids at all. but that's another thread
Jun-16-2011 18:28
Moral Hazard
Oppressing the 99%
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: with the 1%
quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
But if you're taking the 1800s biological textbook/Fledz approach, if a woman makes it to 55 before dying, she has already surpassed her fruitful days and can no longer bear children, so why might her health or appearance matter at that point? If anything, she is saving future children from the debt it takes to facilitate the ensurance of life after 55. Diabetics are quite responsible human beings, really.
Not really. Diabetes is a costly condition to manage and creates or materially contributes to so many other conditions that can be incredibly costly. If they were being fiscally responsible for their children then they would off themselves once they were no longer earning more then they consume; rather, then allowing themselves to detriorate over an extended (albeit shorter then a person in good health) period of time. Maybe if they sought no treatment for their disease or associated sequale one could argue they are being responsible; however, that is rarely the case.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down
Jun-16-2011 18:32
Moral Hazard
Oppressing the 99%
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: with the 1%
quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
to be truly responsible we should have a moratorium on having kids at all. but that's another thread
Can we put that off until my next is born?
Edit: I fully support both you and Hal refraining from procreation... especially Hal
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down
Jun-16-2011 18:33
srussell0018
Chaostician
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Blumsberg
quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
Srussell is an eating disorder denier
I deny an eating disorder being a diagnosable illness in as much as I deny someone going to the Dr. and saying "I'm sad a lot" being diagnosed with a Major Depressive Disorder.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by OrangestO
This isn't about physics, this is about waves.
Jun-16-2011 18:50
nefardec
Tranceaddict in tranning
Registered: Oct 2004
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Can we put that off until my next is born?
Edit: I fully support both you and Hal refraining from procreation... especially Hal
might not be a choice for me :/
Jun-16-2011 18:52
Moral Hazard
Oppressing the 99%
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: with the 1%
quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
might not be a choice for me :/
You could freeze some swimmers now... not in one of those popsicle molds.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about.
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down