|
Ahlamalek, let's settle on this:
If a racist is signed on the forums, and opens a thread discussing why X is a lesser race/state etc. etc. , he gives reasons and avoids swearing. Many users show why in their opinions as to why he is wrong and agian, no one gets furious and no flaming or stupid posts. Great thread so far IMO. Anyway, the thread kinda dies, but after a week or so the racist poster opens a new thread showing no new evidence to support his argument, or revives his thread for no apparent reason to gain any support or opposition, he will deserve having the thread closed and getting a warning (As I've said, I believe a few warnings ought to be worth a suspension). In cases where the new thread seems to fit the old one (guaranteed that the old one hasn't been innactive for too long), the Mod should merge the threads and notify the poster of that. Most of Mike's posts present new evidence or new aspects to look at why he thinks certain organizations or communities (Which are all of an Arab origin but don't necassarily represent the Arab race) should be stopped/ are anti-semite etc.
Some of them,I admit, should have recieved the Merge drill, another reason for opening this thread I guess 
BTW, isn't banning someone from this forum an act of hate towards racists?
In any way, I find it quite debatable to decide whether a post detailing reasons for hate should be considered of hateful nature, just like a slogen of hate for example.
___________________
Check My Music
|