|
summers over
read this :
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Walker, Jane : BPC [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:07 AM
> To: 'Anna'; 'Helen'; 'James'; [email protected][/email];
> [email protected]; 'Rachel'; [email protected][/email]
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward...A dating lesson from New York.
>
> Poor girl, read the bottom two e-mails. It seems to have travelled
> everywhere.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bates, Catherine : BPC
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 10:59 AM
> To: Walker, Jane : BPC
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward...A dating lesson from New York.
>
> Catherine Bates
> Legal Secondee
> Barclays Private Clients Legal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barlow, Tabatha [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 5:09 PM
> To: L1 Paralegals; Bates, Catherine : BPC
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward...A dating lesson from New York.
>
> Go straight to the bottom and then read up two e-mails.... poor girl!
> can't believe how many people have been sent it though
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hopkin, Daniel [[email protected]]
> Sent: 11 September 2002 17:01
> To: Piers Ovenden (E-mail); Tabatha Barlow (E-mail); Oliver Sharp
> (E-mail);
> Dominic Klee (E-mail); Simon Goldsworthy (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward...A dating lesson from New York.
>
>
> Important: This is a personal e-mail and is not an official
communication
> of
> Slaughter and May. In sending this e-mail, the sender is not acting
as an
> agent, representative, or in any other capacity for or on behalf of
> Slaughter and May. Slaughter and May accepts no responsibility or
> liability
> whatsoever and howsoever arising in connection with this e-mail.
>
________________________________________________________________________
__
> __
> _____
>
> think this one is doing the rounds ...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hughes, Mark
> Sent: 11 September 2002 16:53
> To: Dave Bates (E-mail); Felix Lepetit (E-mail); Graham Bailey
(E-mail);
> Iain Bubb (E-mail); Liz Gibbs (E-mail); Rebecca Chalkley (E-mail);
Rich
> L-W
> (E-mail); Rosie Stynes (E-mail); Ru Whitehead (E-mail); Rupert
Pritchett
> (E-mail); Sophie Arber (E-mail); Steve Ginn (E-mail); Steve Pratley
> (E-mail); Will T-P (E-mail); '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'Paul
> Francis'; 'Nigel Wilson-Dykes'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'James
Masters';
> 'Mark Gill'; 'alex harcourt-smith'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; 'Hugo Grubb'; 'Richard Haigh';
> '[email protected]'; 'Daniela Lohlein';
'[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; 'georgina lown'; 'Emma Day'; 'JAMES LANE,
BLOOMBERG/
> LONDON OF'; 'Rory Semple'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; Hopkin, Daniel; McIver, Timothy;
Wetherall,
> Stephen; Cunningham, John; '[email protected]'; 'Allen Pyke
> Associates'
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward...A dating lesson from New York.
>
> 2 emails at bottom - a triumph of technology over intelligence...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Collins, Jennifer:CO (NY)
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 11 September 2002 11:32
> To: Roberts, Catrin:BK1 (NY); 'Davies, Andrew - Investment Banking
> (Exchange)'; 'Durmer, Karis (Exchange)'; Rolfe, Katie:MKT (LN); Lange,
> Franck de: (NY); 'jayda arnold'; 'Hughes, Mark'; 'alex jaques'
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
>
>
> read the 2 emails at the bottom, and take note..
>
> -----Original Message---- -
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 11 September 2002 16:12
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Young, Richard:ICM (LN)
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 4:07 PM
> To: Dan Marks (E-mail); Laird, Nick:LT (LN); Westlife (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
>
>
> you probably have it by now.. read from the end up - last two
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Selwood, Dominic:ICM (LN)
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:55 PM
> To: Hill, Simon: (LN); Young, Richard:ICM (LN); Charles, Malcolm:ICM
(LN);
> Saidha, Bhooshan:ICM (LN)
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
>
>
> hilarious!!! just read bottom two e-mails. moral of the story -
don't
> hit
> REPLY when you mean FORWARD!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected][/email] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:42 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected];
> [email protected][/email]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected][/email]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
>
>
> Scroll to the foot of all the gumph and read the first two messages -
a
> searing indictment of girls I think
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 11 September 2002 15:21
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > > Read from the bottom of the trail
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Elliot Zissman [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 11 September 2002 14:15
> > To: [email protected]; Simon Johnson;
> > [email protected]; Nathan Coast; [email protected];
> > Michael Timmins; [email protected]; Mansley,
> > Robert; Lukmani, Mark; Lorenza Treves; Lars; Karina Gorny; Jono
> > Gourlay; 'Jonathan Licht (E-mail)'; jemma sussman; [email protected];
> > Emma Phillips; Dougherty, Louise; Derek Sansom; Daniel Bayfield;
> > [email protected]; Dan;
> > [email protected]; Charlotte Fallon; Cassian Scott;
> > [email protected]; 'Behrmann, Paul';
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
Angus
> > Henderson; Andrew Leek; Alex Latner
> > Subject: Fw: reply vs. forward....
> > > > well, i guess it's my duty to forward this one as well
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henry Ward
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: 11/09/02 12:23
> > Subject: reply vs. forward....
> > > Doh!
> > Beware all you round-shirking girls, for who foregoes a round...
goes
> > aground... Read up from the bottom...
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom MoodyStuart"
> > To: "Henry Ward"
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:56 AM
> > Subject: Fwd: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:
> > To: ; ;
> > ; ;
> > ; ;
> > ; ;
> >
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 11:36 AM
> > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > > > > Typical bird. Read bottom 2 e-mails.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Milic, Ivona
> > > Sent: 11 September 2002 11:14
> > > To: Hong, George; Tennant, Alistair; Armata, Konstantina; Ground,
Ed
> > > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > read just bottom 2 e-mails :-)
> > > very funny
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joyce, Melissa [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: 11 September 2002 09:25
> > > To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> > > '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> > > '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> > > '[email protected]'; 'Marie-Laure Piganeau'; 'Ward, Hannah';
> > > '[email protected]'; Milic, Ivona; '[email protected]'
> > > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > >
> > > Read from bottom up - just the first 2 emails....
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rajasingham, Arjuna [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: 10 September 2002 22:33
> > > To: Joyce, Melissa; [email protected]; [email protected];
Hedayat,
> > > Naz
> > > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > >
> > > have you seen this yet? read from bottom up. too funny!
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Elisa Kearney [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:46 PM
> > > To: Rajasingham, Arjuna
> > > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > >
> > > Have you seen this - hilaroius - this is real not a forward - you
> > > will love it.
> > > ---------------------- Forwarded by Elisa Kearney/NY/UNO on
10/09/2002
> > > 04:47 PM ---------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > "Brett Hayhurst" on 10/09/2002 02:59:52 PM
> > >
> > > To: "Elisa Kearney (E-mail)"
> > > cc:
> > >
> > > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > > here is what happens in NYC if your not careful.
> > >
> > > B-read from the bottom
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Fred Bruun [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: September 10, 2002 2:41 PM
> > > To: Brett Hayhurst; Fraser Chapman; 'Chris Eby'
> > > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Simon Paradine [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: September 10, 2002 2:19 PM
> > > To: Fred Bruun; Ben Harris
> > > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ettl,Scott [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:05 PM
> > > To: 'Alan Robert Jones'; '[email protected]';
> > > '[email protected]'; 'Dan Yender'; 'Danielle
Ettl';
> > > 'daylyn finnegan'; 'Deana Gazzola'; '[email protected]';
> > > 'Ernie'; 'Jeff
> > > Kempa'; 'JILL'; 'Jonathan Fischer'; '[email protected]'; 'Lisa
> > > Romano';
> > > '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'RJ'; 'Rita
Salcedo';
> > > '[email protected]'
> > > Subject: FW: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > > Ok, basically you want to read the first few e-mails at the
bottom.
> > >
> > > BTW: Danielle, Jeff, Fischer or Steph do you know any of the
people
> > > on this chain? It is a bunch of people from PWC and MSDW.
> > >
> > > Ettl
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rich Perkins [[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:36 AM
> > > To: Allan Goldberg - QuestRG email; Haines,Allison; Ben Lawsky -
> > > work email; Billy Eiselstein - work email; Brett Berman - work
> > > email; Christine Decarlo - email; David Bender - email 1; Shek -
> > > email; David Kamin; David
> > > Weisberg - work email; Errol Deans - work email; Fred Dimyan -
QuestRG
> > > email; Irv Firman - work email; McCleary,Benjamin; Jeremy
Feinstein -
> > > work
> > > email; Joanna Benefico; Josh Kamin - work email; Peter Ackerman;
Rob
> > > Joyce
> > > - work email; Sarah Perkins Stallings - work email; Ettl,Scott;
Scott
> > > Gilefsky; Stephen Stallings - work email; Tracey Daugherty - work
> email
> > > #1
> > > Subject: reply vs. forward....
> > >
> > > Now this is funny. Read from the bottom up?these things spread
fast,
> > > thought I'd help out.
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marie Rentschler [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:06 PM
> > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Subject: Fwd: FW: START from bottom
> > >
> > >
> > > OK. obvi start from the bottom... Anyone remember this guy?? I'm
> > > sorta embarassed...for him and me! But a good laugh on a Monday
> > > morning! Hope you all had great weekends!!!
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Natasha Szarkowski
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:55 PM
> > > To: Becca Parsons; Erin Beguin
> > > Subject: FW: START from bottom
> > >
> > > This is long but fuuny. And Real.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Van Furniss [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:28 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: START from bottom
> > >
> > >
> > > Funny Stuff... not only do i know Trip but i was at the damn party
> > > last nite small world !!!!
> > >
> > > read from the VERY bottom
> > >
> > > dv
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:52 PM
> > > To: Sara Selbert
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > >
> > > ridiculous...
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ditillio Michael [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:14 PM
> > > To: 'Pat Piserchia'; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Mansour, Michael;
> > > 'Anthony Salva (E-mail)'; 'Kim, John H'; 'Sonjay Vishnupad
> > > (E-mail)'; 'Christopher Eddy (E-mail)';
> > > '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> > > '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'Christy Day
(E-mail)';
> > > Dekalo, Limore; Korenberg, Matthew; 'Marcy, Todd'
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > >
> > > start from the bottom and work your way up. i'm sure some of you
> > > have already got this. it seems to have made its way around wall
> > > street. this girl hit reply instead of forward to send this to her
> > > friends.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Freddy Victoria [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:16 PM
> > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > >
> > > you guys will love this...
> > >
> > > Read the first two e-mails from the bottom.
> > > some "poor girl" hit reply instead of forward to a guy she went on
a
> > > date with. Ah, the joys of being single in NYC...
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Laurence B. Elgart [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:50 PM
> > > To: Karina Mayer; Lana Shekhtman (E-mail) (E-mail)
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > I love NY...
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Meyerowitz, Ira [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:27 PM
> > > To: 'Balan (Work)'; Laurence B. Elgart
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > read from the very bottom up. a guy sends an email to a girl he
took
> > > out on a date and she writes a forward to her friend but hits
reply
> > > to the guy.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kuzycz, Adrian
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:41 PM
> > > To: Bordetsky, Barry; Bilfield, Peter; Manoff, Brian; McGuire,
> > > Alexandria; Meyerowitz, Ira
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > How fast until it hits the entire eastern seaboard?
> > >
> > > Adrian I. Kuzycz, Esq.
> > > Littman Krooks & Roth P.C.
> > > 655 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
> > > New York, New York 10017
> > > Telephone: 212.490.2020
> > > Fax: 212.490.2990
> > > www.lkrlaw.com
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Babanskyj, Alexandra
[mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:43 PM
> > > To: '[email protected]'; Dorian Mazurkevich (E-mail); Kuzycz,
> > > Adrian; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > I thought you guys would appreciate this. Scroll down and read
from
> > > bottom up (2 emails)...
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sachse, Will
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:35 PM
> > > To: Babanskyj, Alexandra; Peiffer, Kimberly
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > > check out this bit of social blunder (read from bottom).
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Trunk, Michael
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:25 PM
> > > To: Sachse, Will; Segal, Marc; Robison, William; Gainor, Tracey;
> > > Meredith, Daren; Baird, Lisa; Long, Philip
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > read from the bottom up.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Anderson, Amber
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:24 PM
> > > To: Johnson, Jennifer; Natiello, Christian; Nunziata, Gregg;
Trunk,
> > > Michael
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > email is evil--not to add to this girl's humiliation, but read
from
> > > the bottom up.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bolzan, Anthony
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:13 PM
> > > To: Huntington, Jack; Porter, Matthew; Loughman, Mark; Anderson,
> > > Amber
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > This girl will have to leave the country now . . .
> > >
> > > (read from the bottom)
> > >
> > > email is dangerous
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rauchway, Jonathan [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:42 AM
> > > To: Alexander Ponomarenko (E-mail); Anthony Bolzan (E-mail); Bob
> > > Berstein (E-mail); Caryn G. Mazin (E-mail); Geoff Millsom
(E-mail);
> > > James Augustus S. G. van Wynen (E-mail); Jeremy Heckerling
(E-mail);
> > > Jimmy Blanco
> > > (E-mail); Lon V. D. Hughes (E-mail); Marc Berger (E-mail); Marc
> Watkins
> > > (E-mail);
> > > Michael Koby (E-mail); Sean Melchionda (E-mail); Stuart Klein
> (E-mail);
> > > Tony D'Ambrosio (E-mail)
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Read from the bottom . . .
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rosenberg, Barrie L.
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:24 AM
> > > To: Rauchway, Jonathan; Handley, Siobhan A.
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > Read from the bottom up! This guy wrote an e-mail to this girl,
and
> > > instead of forwarding it to a friend (as was intended), the girl
> > > mistakenly replied to the guy....
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Pastor, Anthony A. [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:42 AM
> > > To: Morty Dubin (E-mail); Amy Bennett (E-mail); Barrie Rosenberg
> > > (E-mail); Brett Gross (E-mail); Kara Topjian (E-mail); Kathyrn
> > > Gambino (E-mail); Laura Mankin (E-mail); Marcello Paoletti
(E-mail);
> > > Rebecca Alden (E-mail);
> > > Colgan, Ryan; De, Sona; Heather Fennell; Jennifer Strent; Kahn,
> Michael
> > > P.;
> > > Khue Hoang; Kotzer, Natalie; Krista Rycroft; Ladejola-Diaba,
> Franciscus;
> > > Michael Beck; Thomas O'Connor
> > > Subject: FW: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:21 AM
> > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > Subject: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > ok, read the bottom 2 emails...this girl needs to learn the
> > > difference btwn reply and forward...SO funny....
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Catherine Jaccodine
> > > General Manager
> > > Conde Nast Bridal Group, Online Properties
> > > 212.286.6377
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To: Catherine Jaccodine/CN Bridal/CNP@CNP, [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], Catherine Jaccodine/CN Bridal/CNP@CNP,
> > > [email protected], [email][email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email][email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected]
> > > cc:
> > > Subject: the next CHUNG IS KING!!
> > >
> > >
> > > How long will it for this one to around and around! Read below -
> > > TREMENDOUS!
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bither, Chris
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:20 AM
> > > To: Adam Furber (E-mail); Andi Bither (E-mail); Anup Goswami
> > > (E-mail); Bob Ruland (E-mail); Dan Seto (E-mail); James Conrad
> > > (E-mail); Keith Dixon (E-mail); Nora stohl (E-mail); Scott Reed
> > > (E-mail); Porter Stohl (E-mail); Ty Carmichael (E-mail); Kasa,
> > > Thomas; Gary E. Zimmerman
> > > (E-mail)
> > > Subject: RE: dang!
> > >
> > >
> > > ouch
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew Finver [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 7:53 AM
> > > To: Andrew Finver
> > > Subject: dang!
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > >
> > > OK, this is a real set of emails - read from the bottom up (won't
> > > take more than a minute) and notice the sender's use of "reply"
> > > rather than forward. ugly dating scene in nyc.
> > >
> > > sucks to be that girl this morning!
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > >
> > > ----- Forwarded by Sam Greene on 09/05/2002 02:13 PM -----
> > > [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected], [email][email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email][email protected], 09/05/2002 01:48
> > > [email protected],
> > > [email protected]
> > > PM cc:
> > > Subject: FW: READ IMMEDIATELY-- UNBELIEVABLE
> > >
> > >
> > > Drop what you're doing and read this. The following is an exchange
> > > between a friend of a guy that sits on our desk and a girl he took
> > > out on a date
> > >
> > > read from the bottom up. oh my lord.
> > >
> > > -------- Forwarded by James William Salter/JPMCHASE on 09/05/2002
> > > 01:44 PM
> > > To: James William Salter/JPMCHASE@JPMORGAN, Arthur
> > > J. Mirante/JPMCHASE@JPMORGAN |
> > > cc:
> > > Subject: FW: All time low
> > >
> > >
> > > Christopher R.D. Cattani
> > > JP Morgan- Institutional Equity Sales
> > > 277 Park Ave- 9th Floor
> > >
> > > ----- Forwarded by Christopher R Cattani/JPMCHASE on 09/05/2002
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tripp Murray
> > > To: Christopher R Cattani
> > > cc:
> > > 01:38 PM
> > > Subject: FW: All Time Low
> > >
> > >
> > > Please, read my email first. Then read her email, I think that she
> > > was forwarding my email to a friend but hit reply instead. You
will
> > > love this
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email][email protected]
> > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:48 AM
> > > To: Tripp Murray
> > > Subject: All time low
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok first -- here is the e-mail I received from Tripp, the new guy
I
> > > met last week. If you want to go out, perhaps we can get him to
pay
> > > for drinks at the Park. Since we have not slept together, he will
of
> > > course be trying to impress me and will, therefore, do anything I
> > > ask. Unlike
> > > John, who fell asleep during sex last night. I went over to his
place
> > > last
> > > night around 11:30. We started having sex. When I noticed his eyes
> > > were closed for a little too long, I said "John wake up." At
which,
> > > point he shot up saying "what'd I miss." Yes, I think that is a
new
> low.
> > >
> > > Let me know about tonight. I think you need company.
> > >
> > >
> > > ------Original Message-----
> > > From: Tripp Murray
> > > To: Mary B Callahan/US/ABAS/[email protected]
> > > cc:
> > > 09/05/2002 10:01
> > > Subject:
> > >
> > >
> > > So are you off to the Bon Jovi show tonight in Times Square?
Sounds
> > > like it is going to some turnout. What division of audit are you
in
> > > for PWC? Are you heading out tonight? A friend of mine is leaving
> > > for MBA School in France so, he is throwing himself a going away
> > > party at Park, ever been? What are the plans for this weekend,
> > > recovery from the long weekend or adding just a little more hurt
to
> > > the situation?
> > >
> > > TTFN,
> > >
> > > Tripp Murray
> > > Associate
> > > TM Capital Corp.
> > >
>
>
|