 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
charmscars
tri-squad bitch

Registered: Oct 2002
Location: GTA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by lipstick
id keep my last, i dont want kids so that answers that question. hypothetically speaking,,,, if i did have a kid,, the last name would depend, i think i have a pretty good last name... but if the person i marry has a nicer one then,, theyd get that one. |
Kennedy girls 4 Life (whon whon)
|
|
Mar-04-2005 15:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
charmscars
tri-squad bitch

Registered: Oct 2002
Location: GTA
|
|
|
on a serious note:
I have no problem w/ women or men deciding to take a spouse's name, that's a personal choice. I think the best arument for having the same name, is having a family with one name, one unit.
That said, I think it's worth taking a look at the historical circumstances that surround this practice. I've mentioned this in other threads: marriage originated as a western practice for men to be able to keep property among their family lines. When men and women married, all of her possesions became his property and thus she became his property. So in that circumstance it totally made sense to take the man's last name- the woman came under his care.
Now, men and women can own their own property and have the capacity to be equals in a relationship. If me and my partner are contributing equally to a family why should I be changing my name and identity? we are taking care of eachother, he is not taking care of me alone. If anything, I am honouring my parents who DID take care of me and raise me to be a self-sufficient adult by keeping their last name. To me, taking a spouse's name is anachronstic, and under no circumstances will I ever do it.
|
|
Mar-04-2005 15:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
Yohan
Champion of Deep&Nu-disco

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ont, Soviet Canuckistan
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by charmscars
on a serious note:
I have no problem w/ women or men deciding to take a spouse's name, that's a personal choice. I think the best arument for having the same name, is having a family with one name, one unit.
That said, I think it's worth taking a look at the historical circumstances that surround this practice. I've mentioned this in other threads: marriage originated as a western practice for men to be able to keep property among their family lines. When men and women married, all of her possesions became his property and thus she became his property. So in that circumstance it totally made sense to take the man's last name- the woman came under his care.
Now, men and women can own their own property and have the capacity to be equals in a relationship. If me and my partner are contributing equally to a family why should I be changing my name and identity? we are taking care of eachother, he is not taking care of me alone. If anything, I am honouring my parents who DID take care of me and raise me to be a self-sufficient adult by keeping their last name. To me, taking a spouse's name is anachronstic, and under no circumstances will I ever do it. |
There's also this kinda weird concept that by wife taking husband's last name, this two become one sort of notion happens. (Or is that just an excuse...)
On more interesting note, Babe Ruth's mom's name was Mrs. Ruth Ruth. 
___________________
Latest mix: Yohan - Full Spectrum (Fall 14 promo)
Like my stuff? Join my FB group here!
| quote: | Originally posted by chinamon
not true. i say "ugh"
but i am a tranny. |
| quote: | Originally posted by kotsy
lol colour me retarded |
|
|
Mar-04-2005 15:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:36.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|