|
Agassi vs Blake was an awesome match...but not as good as Sanguinetti vs Srichaphan. The only reason people say the Agassi Blake match was so good was because it was 2 American players. both famous in the game.
Sanguinetti vs Srichaphan was far better....with both players showing so much respect for one another..smiling at each other, clapping for one another and who can forget Sanguinetti about to serve and he steps back to laugh in the 5th set and while he is laughing looking at Srichaphan in amazement/respect , Srichaphan smiles back and yells "COME ON"...as if to say lets keep this shit going - its fun...lol.
Probally the best set i have seen since 2001....but it just doesnt get the publicity because they are virtual nobodies.
Oh and i was siked that Sanguinetti won...who is only 2 years younger then Agassi...
Classic Match!!
here is the link for those who missed it and want to read about it
Talk about a dramatic finale. It started out like any other match, but it took five sets, three tie-breaks, and 4 hours, 24 minutes for Italian veteran Davide Sanguinetti to dramatically defeat Thailand's Paradorn Srichaphan 6-3, 4-6, 6-7 (2), 7-6 (6), 7-6 (5).
___________________
Bring back 1994 NYC clubbing nights, cus the sh*t today is filled with junk parties and DJs that play sh*t House.....Zabiela, Sander, or Howells and all the rest suck and couldnt throw a night like it was in the early 90s in NYC!!!...Screw Twilo - give me Limelight circa 1993!!!
|
