|
| quote: | Originally posted by Magnetonium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerative_disease < YES, like aging. Its quite normal for people to age.
I dont have the time to search it up now, but its a fact that up to a half of natives died out from diseases that were introduced to them by Europeans. Basically, that says it all about their healthy lifestyles. They were obviously not adapted to the horrible diseases Europeans were carrying - why blame Indians for having healthier lifestyles? You want proof? See http://www.google.ca/search?num=20&...+decay%22&meta= . Check out some of those great articles on how few degenerative diseases natives have and our threat to them (our diseases can wipe them out).
Exactly my point. Except the lifespan, of course. Natives lived separatrely from civilization and usually did not keep records of their life expectancies, which was only calculated last century - amazing high to shock historians. Your data only includes life expectancies of people in civilization. |
Again, please show me these numbers. You suggested that only in the last few decades did we again reach this life expectancy. Can you show me sources, showing the "shock" of these historians, that can scientifically show pre-European Americans came somewhere close to the 70 year life expectancy we have today? I'm sorry, but I need more than your word and you saying, "fact."
| quote: | | As for veganism: its not completely healthy, though its a step in the right direction. I take my B12 supplements, yes I know about the vitamins. I take them every day. |
Well, the article you listed below is about the paleo-diet, something I wrote a thesis paper on during my senior year as an undergrad. A paleo diet receives most of its caloric intake via meat, with nuts, fruits and vegetables being used as supplementary sources of vitamins, minerals and fibers. 75-90% of the calories in the paleolithic diet came from meats, how exactly is your vegan diet a "step in the right direction" when you post a diet that is almost completely the opposite below?
Highly processed foods are not good for you, I'm not sure why there is even a debate as to that. The debate you started was that by being a "normal healthy person," and eating a vegan diet, you would be disease free. Now you're saying that being a vegan isn't completely healthy and it must be supplemented. On top of that, you'd listed someone professing the merits of the paleo diet, one which a vegan would never be able to follow. I'm really not sure when we're going to get a clear answer as to what diet you think is truly healthy. Veganism and the paleo-diet are on quite opposite ends of the spectrum. If it's a strict vegan diet, you've already said that it is not completely healthy and must be supplemented. If it's the paleo diet than your previous post stating that being a vegan leads to a disease-free life is not the way either.
| quote: | | As for diabetes: yes, I know about that. Its just the same story for tuberculosis. My point is, natives dont have it. And we are about to infect them with our unhealthy foods that their bodies are not used to. |
No, you don't get it. Type I diabetes is a genetic defect. Tuberculosis is an acquired disease. People are born with type I diabetes, but they must contract tuberculosis. Are people born with Down's syndrome carrying a contractible disease? Can you acquire mental retardation, enzymatic diseases or genetic deficiencies through contact? The answer is easily 'no.' That is the point, inheritable genetic diseases have little or nothing to do with diet or foods. It has to do with natural variation and mutation. Every population on earth has their share of inheritable genetic deficiencies, including native American populations. Show me a shred of scientific evidence that says native Americans had no genetic disease prior to the European invasion. Furthermore, show me that native Americans did not have type I diabetes (a pandemic affliction for at least the past 4,000 years) before the time of the European conquests.
Tuberculosis and Type I Diabetes have two completely different etiologies and the later is in no way related to "unhealthy foods that our bodies are not used to." Neither is tuberculosis for that matter.
| quote: |
Answer me this. If you were healthy, and then suffered radiation exposure or some kind of poisoning, for example, will it matter how strong immune system do you have? Of course not! Same thing with some flesh eating diseases, contagius diseases and stuff. Strong immune system does not guarantee from disease, you simply have to avoid contact with people. Thats what I was trying to say. |
Well there we have it, no matter how well you eat, your immune system can still fail. Your solution is to isolate yourself from population groups and thus disease. I'm not sure if you think what you're saying is some new, revolutionary idea. Of course if you stay away from any communicable diseases you won't get them. That's the whole idea behind quarantines. But that method or preventing disease has nothing to do with what food you eat. It also does nothing to prevent genetic disease, the diseases you are also questioning.
| quote: |
Taking antibiotics weakens your immune system and subsequently your health. Why let drugs suppress your system when your body was designed to fight the agents? Bacteria eventually develops immunity to the antibiotics, especially if they are used in wrong amounts - its actually very hard to choose the perfect amount as everyone's bodies are different, and some factors include body size, health. Remember, drugs do not cure disease. ONLY THE BODY CAN CURE ITSELF. |
Huh? Can you show me the physiology behind your statement? How exactly do antibiotics weaken your immune system? The immune system of someone with a bacterial infection is already weakened. If the person was able to fight off the infection by themselves, they wouldn't be taking the antibiotics in the first place. Antibiotics target bacteria cell walls, how does that affect the host's immune system? I'm also not sure how the argument that drugs need to be dosed according to the individual makes them a bad thing. A small person requires a different amount of drug for the same effect as a large person would receive. It's no different from the amount of alcohol required to get someone drunk, or the amount of food needed to satiate one's appetite varying by the individual. I see antibiotics used successfully in the hospital setting every day during the fight with cancer. There are rubrics used to calculate antibiotic usage, and they work quite well. Again, antibiotics are used because the BODY CAN'T CURE ITSELF.
The next time you or someone you know gets pneumonia or bronchitis, don't take any antibiotics. Just eat right, and we'll see what happens.
| quote: | | Messing around with genetic engineering/cloning is another possible result of some of the horrific diseases out there, like using animal organs for humans. As all species carry out different illnesses that can jump when genes are mixed and create pandemics like the feared avian flu H5N1. In a way I believe AIDS was a result of a genetic project in Africa gone wrong. Its a very dangeround prject that can wipe us out. When dieases jump species barriers, immune systems have no idea as to how to fight the illness and are annihilated. Diseases only jump in rare cases of really close contact with another species, like contact through blood or genes. Chances for mutation get higher and when it happens, it can spread via other species. |
This is exactly the same basis as a new population group spreading its non-endogenous diseases to other population groups. This transfer of disease from animal to human is also as old as time itself. In fact, it increased greatly when the domestication of animals occurred and can be seen today in it's greatest ferocity in places where people live alongside animal groups.
This has nothing to do with genetic engineering, and everything to do with evolutionary biology. Eating healthy won't do anything to stop it (pathogen evolution). I guess we'd have to go back to your previous example and just completely separate ourselves from all sources of infection. In this case, we're just going to have to live away from all animals.
Okay, I just want to see if I can clarify some of the double-talk that we've gotten so far.
1. Living as a healthy normal person using the vegan diet will cause the immune system to be able to defeat any disease, and you will live disease free.
2. The vegan diet will not allow you to live disease free, but is a step in the right direction.
3. The paleo-diet (the one you listed) is the diet which can be used to live disease free. This diet is actually quite the opposite from the vegan diet.
4. The only way for the body to overcome disease is for it to cure itself.
5. If exposed to radiation or poison (disease), the body cannot cure itself.
6. The only way to stay disease free is to isolate yourself from all disease.
So in the end, it's not what you eat, it's staying away from sick people. Brilliant.
|