 |
|
|
|
 |
Lilith
Meowsies!

Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Maximum Security twilight home for cats
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
(I do find it highly amusing how you can say that the overthrowing of a sovereign government by revolutionary means is NOT political!!!) |
Be thankful you've not lived my life where such things where a reality of simple survival.
| quote: | | I just want you to tell me what you think should be done by the UK Muslim community and the UK government (then we'll take the debate from there...) |
Spare me the sarcastic vitriol.
Better yet, quit going on about the 90's looking for reasons, hindsight hasn't provided anything definitely conclusive and I simply will not be sidelined from the main argument which centres around the problem in the 00's.
Do not press that issue again, you keep doing it, I keep ignoring it for that reason.
Here's the synopsis of what I've written in abbreviated form so far, I don't even pretend for a minute that this is a solution, because for starters I doubt the widespread adoption of this simply because people don't like to be manipulated away from traditional activity, even if it's for their own good. That and change comes in generations.
The only people who talk about 'solutions' are mathematicians and politicians, only mathematicians will give you a definite solution, politicians only do it to get re-elected on the vain hope people believe it.
1: Learn to share your country with a variety of different lifestyles different to your own. No one is asking you to give up yours, but you are required to accept others for being different and not force yours on them, just like they're not allowed to force theirs on you.
2: People will be different to your own religious/secular lifestyle choice, they as are you are allowed to pursue it, just as you are, within the bounds of the countries legal system.
3: Actively pursue and eliminate those elements of your culture, religion and background who seek to harm and murder others in the name of Jihad or Fatwa's issued to do so. It will not be tolerated by the majority of the community and it will do irreparable harm to the Islamic minority in the country in the long term and runs the risk of civil liberties being curtailed in self defence.
4: Religious law is not above a states constitutional law, provided you do not breach constitutional law you are free to practice those elements of religious law.
You're really trying my patience here with irrelevant arguments, attacks and sarcasm. I find it much more expedient to put people on ignore when they get that irritating, once they are on ignore, they do not ever get removed.
I forewarn you on that at this point.
|
|
Jul-05-2007 21:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
George Smiley
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: 9 Bywater Street, Chelsea, London
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lilith
Spare me the sarcastic vitriol. |
The reason I keep asking is because I can't see the point in complaining about something, and demanding that something change, if you don't even offer an alternative
| quote: | Better yet, quit going on about the 90's looking for reasons, hindsight hasn't provided anything definitely conclusive and I simply will not be sidelined from the main argument which centres around the problem in the 00's.
Do not press that issue again, you keep doing it, I keep ignoring it for that reason. |
Again I'll explain my reason for the comparison - Political Islam has been around throughout the twentieth century, and the UK has had a sizeable Muslim community since the 50s. Yet only in the 00's has the problem of Political Islam emerged. There must be a reason why now and not then. If you don't want to think about that then fine, I won't ask you again, but imo it is a very important factor we have to think about when having the debate we're having right now
| quote: | 1: Learn to share your country with a variety of different lifestyles different to your own. No one is asking you to give up yours, but you are required to accept others for being different and not force yours on them, just like they're not allowed to force theirs on you.
2: People will be different to your own religious/secular lifestyle choice, they as are you are allowed to pursue it, just as you are, within the bounds of the countries legal system.
3: Actively pursue and eliminate those elements of your culture, religion and background who seek to harm and murder others in the name of Jihad or Fatwa's issued to do so. It will not be tolerated by the majority of the community and it will do irreparable harm to the Islamic minority in the country in the long term and runs the risk of civil liberties being curtailed in self defence.
4: Religious law is not above a states constitutional law, provided you do not breach constitutional law you are free to practice those elements of religious law. |
Ok so I guess now we are getting somewhere and have something to debate. My problem with the 4 points you raise is that they are either already happening or are not something that can be enforced (by the government for example). I want Islamist terrorism against my country to stop, and I don't think there is anyway what you write above will work (because it's either currently not working or it is something that we have no power over)
| quote: | You're really trying my patience here with irrelevant arguments, attacks and sarcasm. I find it much more expedient to put people on ignore when they get that irritating, once they are on ignore, they do not ever get removed.
I forewarn you on that at this point. |
Well I don't think any of my arguments are irrelevant (otherwise I would not have made them). I admit I have made personal attacks against you but that is because you seem to be heaping all the blame on the entire Muslim population of the UK (see your 4 points above - they place the onus entirely on the Muslim population) and I just don't think that is a fair analysis. I have lived for the last three years in an area that is mainly Muslim communities (on the outskirts of Leeds) and students. I have never seen (or heard of) any problems because of the large Muslim majority that live there. They are all fully integrated into British society and that is true for the vast majority of UK Muslims. They all fulfil points 1,2 and 4 above and for number 3, well they can only do that if they know any Jihadists in their midst (which seeing as the majority have nothing to do with terrorism is unlikely)
|
|
Jul-05-2007 22:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
George Smiley
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: 9 Bywater Street, Chelsea, London
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
True, I haven't really thought about the nationals but then you really can't put them in this category either. 
The nationals?
Lock em up, boot camp, community service, there are lots of options that currently exist.
The law of the land still exists for them doesn't it?
On the fringe side, there's always the death penalty... |
Well no, there's not the death penalty. And we have introduced new Anti-Terrorism laws where nationals/aliens can be jailed/deported for links to terrorism (including inciting killing others). The laws you want are already in place (along with the predicted protests from the civil liberty groups) yet we still face this threat.
I guess it's like crime - the politicians and public can argue and complain as much as they want about how we don't have enough policemen or jails to deal with crime, but at the end of the day, unless you can identify and eliminate the causes of crime no number of new laws, restrictions of civil liberties, numbers of policemen of jails will ever make it go away...
|
|
Jul-05-2007 23:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:40.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|