|
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Wait, wait, wait... there can only ever be one reason for mass malnutrition and that is lack of resources. Displacement may very well compound the lack of reasorces; however, if a person were displaced to a location that could sustain them then they would not be starving. As I said earlier... if the will to support these persons were there then the resources could be provided to them but the cold hard truth is that there is insufficient will to assist these people thus they are left to live off of whatever can be obtained locally, which is insufficient for the number of people concentrated in the area. If there were sufficient local resources then none of these people would starve to death. Since it seems the world is unwilling to send additional resources then the only solution to the imbalance of people:resources is to reduce the number of people.... the most effective way to do this is to simply let nature take it's course. Once the population is reduced to the point that the locally available resources can support it then all that survive and future generations will be better off. |
You're missing the point. Displacement isn't a simple matter of re-locating. It's about the movement of people through violence or the threat of violence into an area that can't support them. The solution here isn't "let everyone who is displaced die off" - that's lunacy. The solution is to address the root causes of malnutrition in the first place. Like you've said, that is not a lack of resources, because thanks to people like Norman Borlaug those resources do exist. It is about limiting the factors that do cause malnutrition in the first place - violence, discrimination, and destroyed infrastructure for the most part.
African states can easily obtain the capability to feed all of their citizens with our help. Whether they have the necessary desire to do so (limiting factors that increase malnutrition) is up to some debate, but that's not the issue you've raised.
The fact is, even where malnutrition is the worst the resources do exist, so a Malthusian equilibrium has not been disturbed.
For more reading on the subject, I'd suggest that Borlaug piece (even though it is outdated and the World Bank has begun to adopt the policies it is criticized for ignoring), and some of the work on the infamous Ethiopian famine of 1983, which is where most of the images of starving African children come from. The Derg regime used starvation as a weapon - it had the capability of addressing malnutrition in the population, but it chose to quell opposition movements by making citizens more concerned with basic survival. In the process, millions were killed.
This paper from the University of Oslo does a pretty good job of covering the basics on that issue:
http://folk.uio.no/alexanv/Famine%2...%20Ethiopia.pdf
___________________
|