 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
jdat
Jay Van Dat

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: I dont even know
|
|
|
first off this wasn't real peer to peer .. otherwise they couldn't block it
damm it I am so pissed
might as well go back to 56k now cause dsl ain't gonna much of a use anymore to me
RIIA is damm tricky in their ways to act, they settled this off the courts, putting anonymous pressure is always better to crush an opponent,
let's be happy for AG ... at least they did it off court, maybe saving them from huge legal costs implicated had they gone through months possibly years of legal battle.
I seriously think their system should be cloned ( yeah cloned! cause it worked damm good, resumable d/l, groups, artist pages etc etc ( apart from all the blocking bs ) and installed in a non copyright country ( taiwan anyone???!! ! ( which I'm going to tomorrow by the way ) )
one thing I had never understood with napster was that all copyrighted material was blocked, did that mean they had done the same thing as ag ? Block artists unless they consented ?
The whole block system AG had could have saved them, think about it, it's really Mainstream artists that didn't want their stuff downloaded ( to some extent ) and the block system was a system which prevented the downloading of songs blocked for copyright issues.... and no FUCKING RIIA MAKES THEM BLOCK EVERYTHING UNLESS ARTISTS CONSENT! (that's f*** bulls*** )
|
|
Jun-18-2002 08:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
Mane
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Poland, Szczecin
|
|
|
Jun-18-2002 08:21
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:37.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|