Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > 16 bit vs. 24 bit AUDIBLE DISCUSSION (NO TECH SPECS)
Pages (11): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
MrJiveBoJingles
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2004
Location: U.S.

What sort of files do you want to use for this? Do you want a full track with drums and everything? Because most tracks will have at least a few 16 bit elements in them...

Old Post Aug-31-2009 00:39  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MrJiveBoJingles Click here to Send MrJiveBoJingles a Private Message Add MrJiveBoJingles to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
coroknight
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Deeper

I honestly don't like threads like this. It just seems like people try to cut corners at every turn. My philosophy is, adhere to the highest quality you can and stick to it.

If you adhere to high quality then those things will add up and you're tracks will sound better. I don't think top producers debate 16 vs 24 bit because if you can use 24 then why not?


___________________

ಠ_ಠ
<|>
/ω\

Old Post Aug-31-2009 01:12  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for coroknight Click here to Send coroknight a Private Message Add coroknight to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
StephenWiley
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2007
Location: Murfreesboro

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
What sort of files do you want to use for this? Do you want a full track with drums and everything? Because most tracks will have at least a few 16 bit elements in them...


I'm really not out to prove anybody right or wrong. The goal of this thread is not to create a dick measuring contest. I wanted peoples opinions on what I discussed in the original post. Nothing more, nothing less. If you want to post some samples, go for it, but that's not really the point of the discussion.


___________________
www.myspace.com/djstephenwiley

www.myspace.com/olympikrecords

Old Post Aug-31-2009 03:18  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for StephenWiley Click here to Send StephenWiley a Private Message Visit StephenWiley's homepage! Add StephenWiley to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
StephenWiley
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2007
Location: Murfreesboro

quote:
Originally posted by coroknight
I honestly don't like threads like this. It just seems like people try to cut corners at every turn. My philosophy is, adhere to the highest quality you can and stick to it.

If you adhere to high quality then those things will add up and you're tracks will sound better. I don't think top producers debate 16 vs 24 bit because if you can use 24 then why not?


This has zero to do with cutting corners. I don't even see how this could be a corner cutter. The questions I asked are not rocket science, nor is the topic at hand. I'm baffled at some of the responses this thread has generated.


___________________
www.myspace.com/djstephenwiley

www.myspace.com/olympikrecords

Old Post Aug-31-2009 03:19  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for StephenWiley Click here to Send StephenWiley a Private Message Visit StephenWiley's homepage! Add StephenWiley to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
evo8
Virtual Wannabe



Registered: Aug 2004
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by DjStephenWiley
There we go. Focusing on the audible side of things. As for encoding mp3's at 24bit, the answer is no. As I said in the original post, 99.9% of stuff that is going through peoples ears is 16bits.

The point of the thread is to gather opinions on the use of 24 bit samples vs. 16 bit samples, as well as how they sound when filtered down to mp3.

Because of various production qualities, and the fact that the changes are extremely subtle, you can only really do comparisons using the exact same source (which you did)

You said you couldn't hear the difference when filtered down to mp3. Could you tell the difference when working with them?

Any positive/negative stories involving projects that used a lot of 24 bit samples that were filtered to 16bit and then mp3?


No i couldnt tell the difference before i converted them to mp3 either. Ill post some loops up later, all 24 bit samples from NI Synthetic Drums, ill convert some 24 bit directly to mp3, then ill render same loops as 16 bit, then convert them to mp3.


___________________
hearthis
soundcloud
youtube

Old Post Aug-31-2009 11:57  Ireland
Click Here to See the Profile for evo8 Click here to Send evo8 a Private Message Visit evo8's homepage! Add evo8 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Blahzaay
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Perth, Australia

quote:
Originally posted by evo8
The more mixes i do the more i realise that half of the shit thats discussed on the various messageboards isnt really that important when it comes to making a decent track.


'Nuff said


___________________
We are the music makers. We are the dreamers of dreams....

Old Post Aug-31-2009 12:40  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Blahzaay Click here to Send Blahzaay a Private Message Add Blahzaay to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DjStephenWiley
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Columbus, OH

quote:
Originally posted by Blahzaay
'Nuff said


Right. I don't see where anybody made any argument contrary to that though?????

This forum discusses fairly specific topics for a huge array of music related stuff. Think of music as a 1,000 piece puzzle, and the topics we have here and discuss are one piece of that puzzle and you don't know where that piece goes in the puzzle. Unless you've got a solid grasp on everything (you saw the puzzle before it was broken down!) you're likely wasting your time.

The forums can be helpful though. You just have to be disciplined and look at subjective and objective things differently. Not every post on this forum is made so you can be the next Tiesticle.

Old Post Aug-31-2009 13:01  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for DjStephenWiley Click here to Send DjStephenWiley a Private Message Add DjStephenWiley to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
coroknight
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Deeper

quote:
Originally posted by DjStephenWiley
Tiesticle.


lol


___________________

ಠ_ಠ
<|>
/ω\

Old Post Aug-31-2009 14:06  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for coroknight Click here to Send coroknight a Private Message Add coroknight to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
evo8
Virtual Wannabe



Registered: Aug 2004
Location:

syn drums 16bit
syn drums 24bit
syn drums X

2 syn drums 16bit
2 syn drums 24bit
2 syn drums X

3 syn drums 16bit
3 syn drums 24bit
3 syn drums X

To whom it may concern - identify the original bitdepth of track X in each of the above

edit: bitdepth not bitrate!!!


___________________
hearthis
soundcloud
youtube

Last edited by evo8 on Aug-31-2009 at 15:17

Old Post Aug-31-2009 14:14  Ireland
Click Here to See the Profile for evo8 Click here to Send evo8 a Private Message Visit evo8's homepage! Add evo8 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Storyteller
Supreme tracneaddict



Registered: Feb 2005
Location: The Netherlands

It's bitdepth, not bitrate.

Bitrate is the ammount of bits processed per X (per second for instance) while bitdepth is the ammount of bits per sample.


___________________

Storyteller Website | Storyteller @ Facebook | Storyteller @ Beatport | Storyteller @ Soundcloud | Stephen J. Kroos - Europa (Storyteller Remix)
Anthony Mea - Get It On (Storyteller Remix)

quote:
If less is more think about how much more more would be.
-Frasier

Old Post Aug-31-2009 14:41  Netherlands
Click Here to See the Profile for Storyteller Click here to Send Storyteller a Private Message Visit Storyteller's homepage! Add Storyteller to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Zak McKracken
Trance



Registered: Jun 2003
Location:

again its a worthless thread. what do u think is best when it comes to audio, 50w amps, or 80w amps? no tech specs allowed.

Old Post Aug-31-2009 16:20 
Click Here to See the Profile for Zak McKracken Click here to Send Zak McKracken a Private Message Add Zak McKracken to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
sixofour.604
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: May 2009
Location:

80w have more power and can probably get louder. So Id go with those.


___________________
E = mc˛/2

E = mc˛ is the optical illusion of E = mc˛/2

Click me to find out why.

Old Post Aug-31-2009 17:23  Lebanon
Click Here to See the Profile for sixofour.604 Click here to Send sixofour.604 a Private Message Add sixofour.604 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > 16 bit vs. 24 bit AUDIBLE DISCUSSION (NO TECH SPECS)
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (11): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackIDed: Robert Gitelman - As You Wish [2007] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackPeter Luts Vs G-bric - "Pacific Wish (Marc La Cruz Remix)" [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!