 |
|
|
|
 |
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
|
|
|
my point is im going to a hockey match now. bye.
|
|
Oct-17-2009 11:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
Fledz
Banned

Registered: Sep 2006
Location: London UK
|
|
|
Oct-17-2009 11:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
Nightshift
...Ninja Business...

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
|
|
|
Oct-17-2009 15:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!

Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe
|
|
|
Yay, another thread where people reject decades or even centuries of scientific and domain knowledge in favour of various forms of wishful thinking and other fallacies, proving conclusively once again that opinions are like assholes (everybody has one).
This one's a real gem:
| quote: | Originally posted by SDM
Some of my favorits like Underworld, Prodigy, Moby, Daft Punk, where all pretty old when successing. Marco V was pretty old when getting world-wide popular. SVD was pretty young and he lastet 1,5 years. |
Do you believe that all of these producers became successful the next day after they took up music? Lol, almost all of these people were intensely wrapped up in music from their mid-teens at the latest. They had to work for years and years to get where they are.
| quote: | Originally posted by Fledz
It doesn't mean everything as there are many variables but it certainly is a large part of being succesful in any industry and no I'm not going to post examples because music is subjective and what I consider a great musician may not necessarily be a great musician to you. |
There's a critical difference between "skilled/talented" and "successful." It may very well be possible to quickly become successful in some particular field through hard work alone, but that doesn't mean you have anywhere near the same level of expertise as the masters, who have been doing it since they were in diapers.
Even the "no genetic advantage" hypothesis in the OP is a canard. You'd have to deny the effectiveness of IQ and aptitude tests on children, calling into question several generations of mainstream psychology and cognitive science. You folks can choose to believe whatever you want, it's a free country, but the scientific fact is that some people DO have a higher learning aptitude than others. To truly be "great" and not just "good", you have to be one of these people, AND start at an early age, AND work your ass off for most of your childhood and early adult years.
You can still produce some very good and commercially-successful tunes if you started 2 years ago, but if you think they're going to sound anything like BT, even after 10 years, you're insane.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|
|
Oct-18-2009 16:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
|
|
|
BT sucks. he need to learn that 90% of the time less is more. Fibonacci Sequence is the exception but im guessing he was high or something when making it caus he never made anything like it before or after, not even close.
|
|
Oct-18-2009 17:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
Kismet7
nononoyesyesyesnonono

Registered: Dec 2008
Location: earf
|
|
|
Agree with much of what was said by the person who wrote that blog in the OP.
But I would not worry if you did not start at 8 or 12 years old, just keep developing your musical and technical aspects to your craft. The Producers who are most successful these days, are not much of musical geniuses, they are more technical geniuses, and have been able to manipulate their equipment. Or they had a talented engineer that made some really great sounding music with them. Go ahead study accross the board, you will see the best EDM music is actually the most well mixed music, but the musical content itself could be of a wide range of quality, but when it comes to the mix, there are no exceptions.
Started doing something musical an early age (12). I think that having a passion to do something musical at an early age asked me to listen to music in a different way than I normally would have as just a listener. So when I would hear a melody or arrangement or different instruments playing, besides enjoying what I chose to listen to, i'd also always listen deconstructively. So from 12 till 20s, I'd break down the parts to a track, and also create in my head where I speculated the track to go next, or where I want to hear the piece of music go.
I could memorize in detail the musical parts and arrangements. This was most enjoyable with songs with interesting arrangements and that had a lot of instruments sharing space. I would constantly create the next few bars in my head as the song progressed. After getting into production, this natural processing of music I listen to went to the next level, to the point that it kinda takes away from music I hear, because i'm always listening with deconstructive and critical ears. I enjoy music still, but for different reasons than I did before I started producing my own.
Starting something musical and playing in a live situation at an early age has helped me, but i'm not sure if it is essential towards becoming great someday...
___________________
_____________________________________
commercial and underground electronic music (house/techno/trance/other) will surpass today's hip hop/pop/rock/country in worldwide interest...if it has'nt already.
|
|
Oct-18-2009 18:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
Nightshift
...Ninja Business...

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento, California
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Kismet7
Agree with much of what was said by the person who wrote that blog in the OP.
But I would not worry if you did not start at 8 or 12 years old, just keep developing your musical and technical aspects to your craft. The Producers who are most successful these days, are not much of musical geniuses, they are more technical geniuses, and have been able to manipulate their equipment. Or they had a talented engineer that made some really great sounding music with them. Go ahead study accross the board, you will see the best EDM music is actually the most well mixed music, but the musical content itself could be of a wide range of quality, but when it comes to the mix, there are no exceptions.
Started doing something musical an early age (12). I think that having a passion to do something musical at an early age asked me to listen to music in a different way than I normally would have as just a listener. So when I would hear a melody or arrangement or different instruments playing, besides enjoying what I chose to listen to, i'd also always listen deconstructively. So from 12 till 20s, I'd break down the parts to a track, and also create in my head where I speculated the track to go next, or where I want to hear the piece of music go.
I could memorize in detail the musical parts and arrangements. This was most enjoyable with songs with interesting arrangements and that had a lot of instruments sharing space. I would constantly create the next few bars in my head as the song progressed. After getting into production, this natural processing of music I listen to went to the next level, to the point that it kinda takes away from music I hear, because i'm always listening with deconstructive and critical ears. I enjoy music still, but for different reasons than I did before I started producing my own.
Starting something musical and playing in a live situation at an early age has helped me, but i'm not sure if it is essential towards becoming great someday... |

___________________
@Soundcloud
:::OUT NOW!:::
Garrido & Skehan ft. Erin - Waiting For You (Nightshift Remix)
Elvin Ong - Motion (Nightshift Remix)
Tidal Forces - Machine Blue (Nightshift Remix)
| quote: | Originally posted by meriter
Your primary focus should be making good music. That's all. No one gives a shit how you do it. And the people that do are fags. |
|
|
Oct-18-2009 19:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
|
|
|
lets not stop this thread, its so awesome. heres a new angle: theres no such thing as talent, no one is born musical geniuses. great musicians are only that because they have been widely/largely exposed to great music and at the same time have the interest in it enough to analyze it and understand it, and then learn the tools needed to create something themselves. peoples ears are mostly the same so we have all the same possibilities from birth to be great musicians. from there its all about interest and being curious. I know people that are musically retarded and i totally see why when i visit them. they dont even have a stereo, and their CDs are a couple of "Absolute Music" compilations they got from their aunt in a birthday 10 years ago. Then I know people that have good taste in music but dont know shit about how music is made etc. And i find out that his father was a dj in the 70-80s. Conclussion, theres no such thing as talent, but theres experienced listeners. And skillz is just plain practise combined with interest and understanding. Let the flames begin.
|
|
Oct-18-2009 21:32
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|