 |
|
|
|
 |
elyhess
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Boulder
|
|
|
i havent even read thru the thread, lots of posts xD but i'de say over compressing kick drums is overdone alot of the times!
___________________
https://soundcloud.com/elyhess/920-1
|
|
Jan-16-2013 23:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
rapt0r
Junior tranceaddict

Registered: Nov 2012
Location: Latvia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by stewart.m
trying to copy the pros just make your own shit sound good |
Copy in some terms (like mixing) is good. It's actually necessary to learn something and "fit-in" in present way of making music. Doing everything your way and is great, being creative is great, but why not to take shortcuts by trying to copy and learning in that way to make music for present requirements (especially when it comes to sound design). Besides, you have to fit it in what crowd likes to promote yourself, and this is the way to do it, to make everyone hear you. And this should (must?) be done to get attention BEFORE you post something of your "real soul creations"
/Have you noticed, that many artists, especially ones producing some electronic music subtype, change their style almost drastically months after they go on charts? They got attention they wanted, they are more free to do anything their way./
"Fake it before you make it." in my opinion is a good one attitude.
As for the topic:
Rushing - Posting something that you KNOW could be done better. (I've done (and am doing still) this a lot, just get impatient and post on SoundCloud half-breed mix, which, with work, could be times better in terms of..well..everything. Mixing, Production, Sound design...) I don't know real reasons behind this. It may be just rushing and impatience to make your creation public and get the feel of "I created something," without giving a f*** that track is weak, uninteresting, beach dance track reminding 80 year old virgin going berserk on dance floor supported by sounds reminding rheumatism. It's still a virgin though, awaiting for someones ears to "open it's treasure chest." Maybe it's inability to realize that track isn't that good and the fact that you made a track doesn't quite make you an artist. Or at least artist that is praisable in every possible way you expect. Maybe, like in my case, it's just a pure laziness. Do nothing, expect much. Need to do something with this attitude. And Under this one goes many other mistakes like
Not giving attention to details.
Not giving enough thought on idea of track.
Not paying attention on quality and real purpose of plugins (but don't limit yourself, be creative, many times another purpose plugin makes a great, unpredictable, desirable and creative effect). As an example, I will make FL's native Fruity Reverb plugin, which, for electronic instruments is bareable, but when it comes to live intruments, it's just awful. (But, as mentioned above, don't overdo and spend money on stuff that you will do nothing with. Useful thing at this stage is..khem..being a nasty pirate.)
Overdoing. This goes everywhere. Making too much of some effect or raising everything too high. When producing a track, you need to look at the "bigger picture," sight and feel of the whole track is important. Many, when mixing, end their "session" by mixing looking at each track individually and stop there.
Not in thinking mood, possibly wrote some crap here.
___________________
<iframe width="100%" height="166" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F74178287"></iframe>
Last edited by rapt0r on Jan-17-2013 at 03:04
|
|
Jan-17-2013 02:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zombie0915

Registered: Jul 2001
Location:
|
|
|
If it's all about finding novelty in sound design and we've pretty much exhausted the musically useful settings of subtractive and FM synthesis, then what is left there? I guess you can filter the shit out of some noise, theres probably some novelty left in granular, additive, and physical modeling methods as well.
Are we to all learn max/msp, PD, csound, supercollider and that kind of stuff to arrive at something new production wise?
Right now what I hear happening is mostly massive and FM8 usage, not that I mind it, the FM8 is rather fun to play with. I'm just not sure if the continued exploration of synth programming as an avenue to new art won't also dry up rather quickly, unless we start developing a taste for different varieties of squelchy noise configurations.
The real artsy folks around me are way into this glitchy computer crashing type stuff but I don't really feel the new in it, people have been doing glitch for ages and to me it all sounds the same.
|
|
Jan-21-2013 18:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Zombie0915
The real artsy folks around me are way into this glitchy computer crashing type stuff but I don't really feel the new in it, people have been doing glitch for ages and to me it all sounds the same. |
Same here. I'm not hearing anything production-wise which people weren't doing a couple of decades ago. Meh, not that I care. People can do all the glitching and production techniquery they like, each to their own. There's still plenty of good music from people who don't get lost in all that stuff.
|
|
Jan-22-2013 00:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
Looney4Clooney
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2010
Location:
|
|
|
Jan-22-2013 00:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
If we get into a discussion of what consitutes "new" we could be here for years. Is pushing a compressor's ratio knob way higher "new"? Is adding a twentieth "bass" sound "new", as opposed to adding a twentieth drum sound, or a twentieth "synth" sound?
Are we talking in terms of "mainstream" artists, or "nobody at all, no matter how mad-geniusy they were, had ever tried anything like this before Year XX"?
Sure, I can point to changes here and there, but I'd have a hard time definitively stating "this particular sound, or technique, has no precedent".
In the end, to me it doesn't matter whether any aspect of production is new or not. If a song has a catchy melody, I'll give it some ear time. Genre doesn't really matter.
|
|
Jan-22-2013 01:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
I'm more than happy to listen to people doing something slightly differently, production wise, but the melody comes first for me. And luckily there are still artists where that matters to them.
For other artists, like squarepusher, noisia etc, production technique is the only thing going on. Only when they're doing a remix does a melody stay in there (unless they can find a way to drop it).
For me, what these artists are doing is irrelevant; meaningless.
Maybe it is just me, but I hope catchy pop/dance tunes continue to find more listeners than glitch/noise artists.
|
|
Jan-22-2013 03:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
Looney4Clooney
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Apr 2010
Location:
|
|
|
Jan-22-2013 04:15
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:28.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|