 |
|
|
|
 |
starglider
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJMaytag
OK, so what about the shady DJ's that download rips and burn to CD without ever intending to buy the vinyls? They're not only impacting sales by using material that they should be buying, but they're often even profiting from it! |
You won't find many people on here who condone that kind of behaviour. To be fair though, I can't imagine those kind of individuals represent a very large portion of all music lovers. But yeah, they're basically thieves and aren't doing the right thing. What are you going to do, tell them to stop? Preach at them? That won't accomplish anything. Oh wait, that's what you're doing here too.
As Gareth so eloquently put it:
However, in any case, mp3s aren’t going to go away – the cat is well and truly out of the bag and will never be going back in, so the industry needs to stop moaning and work within the new environment.
|
|
Mar-11-2003 01:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
DJMaytag
Supreme Pizzaaddict

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: back in Madison, WI... again!
|
|
|
Mar-11-2003 01:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
gaz@influential
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Southampton
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by starglider
As Gareth so eloquently put it:
However, in any case, mp3s aren’t going to go away – the cat is well and truly out of the bag and will never be going back in, so the industry needs to stop moaning and work within the new environment. |
I remember writing that, but can't remember where I wrote it. Where was it again? 
Anyway - I was a staunch supporter of mp3s for years, and still am in a way, however I started to change my stance a little when my favourite record labels started to go bust 
I still stand by that statement: mp3s aren't going to go away, and the more we preach at downloaders, the more they're going to stick two fingers up. Fact is, they don't feel sorry for record labels (even when they go bust) and they don't feel sorry for artists, even when they're not getting paid. End of.
This means there's no point saying "what you're doing is wrong", when people think they've got a right to download this music. All that producers and labels can do is become increasingly protective over their music prior to release - which you'll find a lot of people doing, which is a shame in my opinion but the way it's going.
Gaz
NB: I have no problem whatsoever with people downloading music for preview purposes, for example to decide whether to buy vinyl or not. My only gripe is with people who download everything (singles, albums) and don't put a penny back in - this minority of people is giving sensible mp3 users (ie: the majority) a bad reputation.
|
|
Mar-11-2003 17:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
Sand Leaper
Tension hunter

Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
Mar-11-2003 17:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
|
|
| quote: | If you want to talk about extreme, try doing this: I wasn't able to find much of the good trance after 1996, so I was stuck listening to a rotation of pretty much ONLY these CD's for several YEARS:
Sasha & Digweed - Nothern Exposure 2 (Westcoast)
Thomas Michaal - West Coast Vibe
The Mix by David Padilla
DJ Energy - Megatones
Dave Ralph - Tranceport II
Trancesylvania 9
Chris Fortier - Alpha |
How 'bout that, a Thomas Michael fan! I still have West Coast Vibe in my glove compartment! Similar list for me while in grad. school working on my thesis:
Sasha and Digweed - Northern Exposure 2
Digweed - Bedrock
Thomas Michael - West Coast Vibe
Burnt copy of Oakenfold's GOA mix (all in one- no cues for songs)
Orbital - Diversions
Hackers - Original Soundtrack
Amazing how worn out these CDs are. In regards to your arguments, I tend to agree with you on some of your points here. However, it seems that you've been around the block a little longer than most here, and kinda set your expectations on others on what you feel is most appropriate for those to buy and support the music. Many folks here (like myself) don't have the luxury of having time and money to go out and buy vinyl to educate ourselves on the music we like. MP3's are definitely a convienience factor, which seems to be the tune of everything our generation does nowadays (that "gotta have it now and I don't want to make an effort" attitude). Admittedly, I fall under this category at times as I've downloaded many o' singles as well as full length CD mixes (and then just got the cuesheets off of various websites). I'm especially not too proud of downloading full-length CDs, and haven't done that for some time now (nor will I ever anymore). But truthfully, I really didn't know how much something like that could potentially effect the artists and possibly affect their sales until I started paying attention to record shop closings, artists' pleas to buy their music, etc. (by the way, for those of you who believe that artists aren't concerned with file swapping, go to Dave Gabriel's posts in the Music Discussion). This is, in essence, stealing to me, and I feel pretty idiotic for not knowing this when I did do it.
And I guess to a certain extent I believe that downloading singles should be considered the same as well. Those folks who are crying "foul" over you making this a point have likely a few gigs of singles on their hard drives (as I do). Most websites that post singles downloades will say something along the lines of "for promo only - please buy the single if you enjoy". Sure, they may be trying to cover their ass in legalities, but they also post this to help the music industry, not hurt it. I don't like the fact that this distribution may definitely be hurting the industry and the artists, and I may deny it 'till I'm blue in the face. But it seems that MP3's are definitely becoming a piece in the puzzle, whether people want to believe this or not.
Yeah, there are other pieces. For example, crap music being produced in mass quantities by the record lables. This is undeniable for all genres of music! For some reason, record lables think it more appropriate to produce quantity, not quality. Another factor is the fascist d$ckhead stance of the RIAA and their neo-Nazi methods of hard-ball lobbying (currently more powerful than the NRA according to some politicians) and attempts to shut down ALL P2P file swappers (or throw all users in jail!). Yet another factor is the decline in economy, which many companies seem to be in denial about. But it is difficult to measure how much affect MP3 file swapping has on the decline in sales, but it's part of the problem nonetheless whether you want to believe it or not. Now some of you can hide and say, "I only download music so I can buy it in the stores!". Now granted, a select few of you may actually do this, but to the rest of you (and you know who you are), you're LYING THROUGH YOUR TEETH!
So what's to be done here? Like others have said, there has to be a compromise here. P2P will not go away, no matter how hard RIAA comes down on everyone. People on the internet are just too clever, and the legalities of things will always be in question. Besides, despite the potential hurt P2P has done, it has also helped a great many artists (which is also difficult to measure), and that is also undeniable. However, artists need to be respected, and their music should be purchased to show that respect. I've begun to make purchases again, not just of mix CDs, but singles as well. I feel pretty good about that. Now, I won't lie, I'll still grab an MP3 off the internet here and there, and I won't grab it "for promo only". But I'm really making a habit out of purchasing music again. I also think that the "scene" will do itself some good with it's music by finding it's identity again, considering it seems a little lost and has no real sense of direction. Finally, if we ever see an upturn in our economy, things will hopefully pick up for everyone - artists and record companies. Geez I ramble. Sorry.
___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...
|
|
Mar-11-2003 17:14
|
|
|
 |
 |
TOR
Traveller

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Bruges, Belgium
|
|
|
there is a significant difference between the pop industry and the trance industry. britney spears, christina aguilera, etc. are most certainly being affected by the download of mp3, as they release all their music on cd. people download these cd's without paying anything for it. lightning records and other trance labels, on the other hand, rely mainly on vinyl sales.
as stated before, mp3 is a great possibility for dj's to prelisten new releases and select which ones to buy on vinyl afterwards. they get to know more tracks as well, and with being able to purchase these records online, we can hardly speak of a loss of revenues at that point.
then we have the people who don't dj. they download new releases, but since they never buy vinyls anyway (why purchase turntables when you're not planning to dj?), labels do not lose any money because of them either.
the only losses labels experience, come from cd-compilations and albums, and the one or two shady dj's you talked about. but this is not the only reason for the bankrupcy of lightning in any way!
___________________
| quote: | Originally texted by Jakhira
Out with the dog at the moment. Chicks love him, and I love chicks... The world is in harmony  |
|
|
Mar-11-2003 18:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|