quote:

Originally posted by inconspicuous I know...that was the basis of the joke :/

hey at least we can still make some Rob Nen jokes. Same city, different sport and different guy. both died.

___________________

I like Rob Nen

Is Mark Wohlers dead yet?

quote:

Originally posted by LeopoldStotch hey hey ... no one bashes the champs around here. 4 rings in 9 years..... dynasty!!!!!!!!!! i know that pisses off vern when i call the spurs a dynasty.

it's because they're clearly NOT a dynasty



yet

___________________

quote:

[11:58] Bas //: fuck he's hot

quote:

Originally posted by LeopoldStotch hey at least we can still make some Rob Nen jokes. Same city, different sport and different guy. both died.

it's rod beck

___________________

quote:

[11:58] Bas //: fuck he's hot

quote:

Originally posted by verndogs it's because they're clearly NOT a dynasty yet

Yeah, in thinking about it I don't consider them to be a dynasty. The championships were way too spead out. That doesn't equal dynasty. Sorry it just doesn't. They aren't even repeat champions or made the finals the previous year. That term is thrown around too much.

Pats...3 super bowls in 4 years? I think that isn't the classic definition of 4 championships but football is harder to repeat in all of sports. Has any team won more than 2 in a row? No. So 3 out of 4 should be the gauge. Therefore, I'd give the Cowgirls and the Pansies as the only ones. Begrudgingly..... yuck

Yankees 1996-2001, that's a dynasty!! Especially being the best team ever assembled (1998).

___________________
Yankees
Rams
Blazers
Man U
Oregon Ducks

quote:

Originally posted by Member of X Yeah, in thinking about it I don't consider them to be a dynasty. The championships were way too spead out. That doesn't equal dynasty. Sorry it just doesn't. They aren't even repeat champions or made the finals the previous year. That term is thrown around too much. Pats...3 super bowls in 4 years? I think that isn't the classic definition of 4 championships but football is harder to repeat in all of sports. Has any team won more than 2 in a row? No. So 3 out of 4 should be the gauge. Therefore, I'd give the Cowgirls and the Pansies as the only ones. Begrudgingly..... yuck Yankees 1996-2001, that's a dynasty!! Especially being the best team ever assembled (1998).

plus, its San Antonio... they got................ONE professional team.... ONE.... thats not a sports city/town/region.... Dynasty also depends on where it is... unless the......Carolina Panthers go out and win 4 super bowls in a row, then well, i'm full of shit...

but what I'm saying, if the Bulls or Lakers did what the Spurs have done, it'd probably be more of a dynasty than the boring-ass spurzzzz....

___________________
lance

quote:

Originally posted by King Ecnal plus, its San Antonio... they got................ONE professional team.... ONE.... thats not a sports city/town/region.... Dynasty also depends on where it is

classic NE elitist bullshit.


they're not a dynasty because they've never completely dominated every other team for a stretch of years. Dynasty status has nothing to do with location.

quote:

Originally posted by inconspicuous classic NE elitist bullshit.

lol, and I wasn't even going for that... I didn't mention the Celtics on purpose, and I still come off as Elitist???

Shit, GO ME!!!

___________________
lance

Actually, I agree. They are not a dynasty yet. If they can win it this upcoming year, I think they will be. Still, the Lakers won three straight, whereas we have never won two in a row. Kind of sad. We were close though.

___________________
Vernato

quote:

Originally posted by King Ecnal lol, and I wasn't even going for that... I didn't mention the Celtics on purpose, and I still come off as Elitist??? Shit, GO ME!!!

Mentioning the Celtics obviously wouldn't be elitist since they've sucked for countless years.

___________________
Yankees
Rams
Blazers
Man U
Oregon Ducks

quote:

Originally posted by Member of X Mentioning the Celtics obviously wouldn't be elitist since they've sucked for countless years.

it was an EXAMPLE... ass

___________________
lance

Well, who do you think will be early favourite for the next season? I suppose, that Mavs will be no afraid of rising Warriors and finally win!

___________________
It`s nice to be important, but it`s more important to be nice!

http://fans.nhl.com/5A-thumbs/16955/oilers_losers.gif