|
| quote: | | if you knew ANYTHING about those whose "research" forms the backbone of the 911 movement you wouldnt be so convinced. unfortunately, you are incapable of telling fact from fiction and there is nothing i can help you with im afraid. |
When countless officials from the CIA, the US military, firefighters, rescue workers both past and present tell the public it was an inside job I'd rather take their word then your waste of an opinion and web space.
Sounds like you have not even bothered to read the links and watch some of the interviews from these very same people posted up in this thread because your arguing simply without logic.
| quote: | | oh of course! we should always go with what everyone else thinks! woohoo! also, the question is deliberately ambiguous, i guarantee you you'd get a different response if you said "do you believe the US government planted explosives in the WTCs", but i wouldnt expect you to understand that. |
In a case like most decided by a jury majority does decide the outcome of a decision, sorry but there goes the official 9/11 story you cling on to in your very narrow mind.
If explosives where planted as you say I would gladly take that over what is in the books providing there is proper evidence backing it. Fires certainly did not cause WTC7 to come down and no plane hit that building, no brainer here but who said you had any to begin with.
Who really cares if it was the US government who did it, if it all points to an inside job there should be an independent investigation to finally get it right.
The 9/11 commission report sure seemed to mess it up completely but I am sure this is where you get your top notch research info from. (one very big 700 page preschool book)
Adults think for themselves, children read fairy tales.
|