 |
|
|
|
 |
Romp
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
Economically, Howard and Latham are pretty much the same. Both are from the neo-liberal, free-market, economic rationalist school, whatever you want to call it. Budget surpluses, minimal government regulation and interference.
Foreign policy again fairly similar. Both want to fight the war on terror. Both support the American alliance. Howard sucks up to Bush a bit more. Labor traditionally has better relationship with Asia.
Where the real difference is is in social policy. Do you believe that all Australians should have health care, the ability to have a good free education and to go to university? Whoever was talking about removing HECS, how do you think people from working class or poorer backgrounds will ever go to university then? They have to work for 10 years until they can afford to go? There are already rich people 'jumping the queue' and taking university places ahead of poor people who have a better UAI but cant afford full fees.
Shouldnt everyone have the opportunity in Australia to better themselves and make something of their lifes? Equality of opportunity is what its about.
Should we just think of ourselves like Americans or should we care about our fellow Australians? Howard is trying to make our society like America's, where the rich are getting richer and 20% of people are living in poverty in mobile homes with no health insurance at all? Not to mention all the crime as a result of inequality.
Do we want to fuck up our environment and the earth anymore than we already have done? We have probably the best natural environment of any country yet we are just exploiting it. Why not sign the Kyoto agreement? Don't we care about the world our children and grandchildren will be living in?
Shouldnt Australia be a tolerant society? Since Howard came to power we have had the Tampa incident, refusing to say sorry to Aboriginals and children and innocent people in detention for years. I dont think this is what Australia is about.
Australia has always been the land of opportunity and mateship. We should be looking after our country for our children, helping each other out and creating a society which anyone would be happy to live in.
Under Howard we are heading towards a society of selfishness, intolerance and inequality. In fact society has already changed since he has been in power.
|
|
Sep-15-2004 04:06
|
|
|
 |
 |
arctic
Teh Pwn

Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by matt_a
I cant be fucked replying to your whole article, simply acuse I can't see the point, if you want to run in the special olymipics thats up to you.
Simple fact is the fluff that Latham is advocating, is nothing more than a superficial facard to cover his clear lack of real political insight. |
I disagree with the economic rationalist/neo-liberal stuff that he peddles, but you can hardly say that he lacks 'real political insight'. Read his books if you're interested in what he advocated -- there are actually some pretty radical ideas in them.
| quote: | | I havent heard anything deeper than "Ease the Squeeze" and if you watch the Labour party during question time, you might realise why. |
Howard repeats inane phrases as well -- all political leaders do it. It appeals to stupid people unfortunately, and the rest of us just have to put up with it.
| quote: | | Oh another thing was when Latham was asked about Universities, he didn't mention them and proceeded to talk about giving more money to catholic and small independant schools. |
Again, he debate is more about image and impression. He evidently felt that the independent school point would get him more votes/traction. Look on the ALP website for policy, you're better off to ignore the debate (that goes for the Coalition as well).
| quote: | | It seems as though his education policy is to take from the very rich private schools, and give it to the growing private schools. This is why I can't see that schooling is an issue, because the public schools look like getting jack all either way! |
Not really he's giving it to struggling private and public schools. That being said, I disagree with his policy, which is why i'm not voting for him.
|
|
Sep-15-2004 04:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
rez
infected

Registered: May 2001
Location: at your local chemist
|
|
|
Sep-15-2004 05:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
AussieTrance
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by batemanscott
If labour do get in i think alot of you pushing their cause will get a rude surprise as just how mislead you have been.
|
As opposed to say Howard, with GST, $100,000 degrees, Iraq, Children overboard, the list goes on and on - bet you didnt see these coming when you people voted for him, again and again...
And another thing..
Of course you have a great surplus, you ripped the friggen funding out of education and health (both of which are stuffed beyond recognition, and will cost billions to fix - there goes the surplus right there!).. And because most states are Labour run, you just pass the blame on to them.
___________________
yep
|
|
Sep-15-2004 08:11
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|