Re: Re: Re: Re: Trance now vs. Trance then (pre 1995)
quote:
Originally posted by noikeee
It simply sounds dated... and an EDM-knowledgable crowd would immediately identify it as dated and uncool..
I get what you're saying and here's a thought, even today's music is dated coz it sounds like... today's music.
Not everyone attending a club/festival environment will be EDM-knowledgeable, and those people wouldn't give a stuff whether it's dated or not. If it's good music it will get them moving, and that's what it's all about.
___________________
This is trance...
Jose Amnesia - The Eternal (Pulser Remix) / Chicane - Saltwater / Photon Project - Illumination / Gouryella - Tenshi / Altitude - Altitude (SHOKK Remix) / Rank 1 - Airwave / The Thrillseekers - Synaesthesia (En Motion Mix)
Dec-01-2007 16:12
SMC
custom title addict
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Trance now vs. Trance then (pre 1995)
quote:
Originally posted by eRRaTiK
I get what you're saying and here's a thought, even today's music is dated coz it sounds like... today's music.
Not everyone attending a club/festival environment will be EDM-knowledgeable, and those people wouldn't give a stuff whether it's dated or not. If it's good music it will get them moving, and that's what it's all about.
I don't think "dated" is necessarily a bad thing, and if it is, well, then "dated" is simply in the mind of those who don't really appreciate the qualities that in their view make something "dated".
If that makes any sense?
For example, i love 80s new wave. I love the sound of the 80s, the loud snares and overuse of reverb. There are people who say that those things sound dated, with a negative connotation.
Dec-01-2007 16:33
isoterra
hi
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Nottingham, UK
quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
So basically what this all comes down to is as follows:
You were stung by the Ishkur-lead anti-epic trance rhetoric that latter-day trance isn't "real trance", and because you're a pussy you were unable to shake off any strongly worded contrary opinion, which instead festered inside your mind like a splinter to the point it became an affront to your musical tastes. As a result, you now instinctively feel the need to put down any support of "real trance" while simultaneously championing latter-day trance, thus validating yourself. This is evidenced by the fact that you constantly refer to things like "experience" and "being there" with the implication that pro-"real trance" listeners don't fulfill them and thus the "real" in "real trance" appreciation is actually a fallacy. Also notable is that you mentioned Ishkur in this thread and the fact you seem to blindly assign his ultra-opinionated views onto anyone who in any way supports "real trance".
So congratulations. You had your insecure, unconfident opinion shaken and now you'll spend your entire forum existence trying to define it in contrast with a stronger, more confident perspective, written to wind you up in the first place.
nail on head
Dec-01-2007 17:36
LoveHate
...........
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver
Dec-01-2007 19:53
wotyzoid
it's not house
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: New Jersey
if Paul played those tracks i would have an euphoria attack and kick the shit out of the guidos in the venue.
Originally posted by EvoX
in '93 i was 16 and already clubbing ....
love to here the old tunes ..... and there are enough party's where they play um so what's the prob??
enough people nowadays young and old still go crazy on the old tunes...
being in the states... different results
age 9... addicted to women... SEX... no trance
today, i have little knowledge of all the old tracks
'99 - '04... that's it...
___________________
Where has the time gone??????
Dec-02-2007 03:45
chadi
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: United States
quote:
Originally posted by LoveHate
Oooooh
Dec-02-2007 05:03
the_gamemaster
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Derby/Nottingham, UK
Trance today is so much easier to mix than 'old' trance, which didnt seem to have any discernible kick. Now compare that to the HUGE kicks tracks have today *cough* sean tyas.
Dec-03-2007 15:34
Mr.Mystery
Static Guru
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Vantaa
quote:
Originally posted by the_gamemaster
Trance today is so much easier to mix than 'old' trance, which didnt seem to have any discernible kick. Now compare that to the HUGE kicks tracks have today *cough* sean tyas.
Not to mention the exact same structure in each track so you can mix tracks you haven't even listened to before.