|
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Negative Ghost Rider... the key here is did the driver of the striking vehicle take proper action to avoid the accident as would a reasonable person... the answer is no. A reasonable person would have seen the stopped vehicle, identified it as stopped and taken action to either move around it or stop behind it. The circumstances of why she stopped make very little difference, he had opportunity to avoid and failed to do so, he is the proximate cause, he is at fault. Your argument is about the same as arguing that the city is liable for you hitting a pot hole because the pot hole shouldn't have been there. |
It can be tough to tell that a car is stopped in a snow-flurry, the moving snow can play tricks with your eyes such that a stopped vehicle can appear to be moving. But otherwise, yes, it should be fairly simple to avoid a stopped car if you're paying attention.
___________________
Captain Planet is gey.
Water, Fire, Earth, Wind, Heart???
These forces are supposed to combine to create Captain Planet?
Bullshit.
Those forces combine to create a soaking, boiling mudstorm on Valentine's Day.
|