|
| quote: | Originally posted by FunkyCrew
excellent points this guy makes, me thinks - http://stevemunro.ca/?p=4333
| quote: | | delivery trucks, illegally parked cars, taxis, J-walking pedestrians | |
All things that a street car cannot get out of the way of! So if they get buses sometimes, then they would get streetcars far more often, can be well observed downtown.
Have you ever seen a street car fail downtown during rush hour? It is pure chaos. I've said screw it, and just walked home from King and John to Roncy. I don't understand how this is even a debate. If it cannot get out of the way of an obstacle, then it is not very useful as a mode of transportation.
| quote: | Originally posted by MarkT
counterpoints I've read have noted that streetcars have significantly higher capacity than buses and the newer ones will have even greater capacity.
thus the argument is that more buses would need to be on the road to move the same # of people as streetcars, which is highly relevant if you're comparing emissions, congestion, maintenance costs, labour costs (every vehicle needs a driver), etc. |
That is only if you ignore, new designs in buses, and the greater space efficiency which is constantly being developed.
Why couldn't you have a bus with the same capacity? If you can have those trolly cars, then it seems very plausable to have higher capacity buses.
Sure introduce potential, and future streetcars into the debate, but don't make the same inclusion for buses. 
|