They cant improve their knowledge, the 911 truth is god to them. They dont think they are right they know they are right. Trying to argue with them is like arguing with a creationist. Sooner or later, somebody is going to have an aneurism.










EDIT:

I take that back. Some apparently can improve on their knowledge.

___________________

Last edited by Moongoose on Sep-11-2011 at 09:54

lolol just being a dick

___________________
Nothing to see here

inb4moongoosecomparesthistogod


oh wait

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by OrangestO This isn't about physics, this is about waves.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by DJ Mikey Mike Social outcasts are often of the opinion that they must have a drink before being able to loosen up with their inhibitions, thus being able to have a good time. There's a word that sums up this sort of behaviour, and that word is 'reject.'

GET THAT BULLSHIT OUT OF HERE..

let's see, next post will be loose change i bet

quote:

Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit GET THAT BULLSHIT OUT OF HERE.. let's see, next post will be loose change i bet

How's it bullshit?







Fax your reply, please.

___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012

quote:

Originally posted by EddieZilker Do you have a credible source for any of your conjecture about explosions prior to plane crashes or windows being blown out? The scope of your knowledge - qualified with the phrase, "as far as I know" - seems rather paltry against the scope of the public record. As far as I know, you're either not very good at trolling or you suffer from an advanced form of scoliosis, so severe, that it has impelled your head almost completely up your ass.

I first saw a video of someone beside the first tower saying "What the fuck was that" after hearing an explosion. Few seconds later you can see the plane flying in which causes another explosion of course. Couldn't find that video any more after I read some more. Maybe it's still in my Opera cache. Of course I know the video can be a fake like any video can be.

With "as far as I know" I meant that that is what I have heard on t.v. or read on internet. No way I can check whether the source is reliable or not.
But hey if you think WTC7 didn't collapse at 911, a whole lot of sites are showing a wrong date.
This one was interesting too:
http://truthandshadows.wordpress.co...liam-rodriguez/

___________________

Longest (classic) Trance playlist on YouTube (5000 tracks released up to and including 1997), click here

it's overtly dramatized bullshit. While i obviously do agree that there was no proper pretext to the war in iraq, jumping the gun and saying that in fact bush had been complicit in the 9/11 situation is a grotesque and opportunistic move that feeds the fuel to the flame of gullable and ignorant 9/11 truthers.


here's something to start you off.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahren...sumed_innocence


edit:

as well:




1:31 please.

Last edited by Nrg2Nfinit on Sep-13-2011 at 02:03

quote:

Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit

You know you're clutching at straws when you have to resort to Chris Hitchens.

9/11 film has zero to do with conspricay theories. It's just plain fact. Of course it's used to form a view, but ultimately it is the simple truth. And it makes people uncomfortable.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by DJ Mikey Mike Social outcasts are often of the opinion that they must have a drink before being able to loosen up with their inhibitions, thus being able to have a good time. There's a word that sums up this sort of behaviour, and that word is 'reject.'

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-MB I first saw a video of someone beside the first tower saying "What the fuck was that" after hearing an explosion. Few seconds later you can see the plane flying in which causes another explosion of course. Couldn't find that video any more after I read some more. Maybe it's still in my Opera cache. Of course I know the video can be a fake like any video can be. With "as far as I know" I meant that that is what I have heard on t.v. or read on internet. No way I can check whether the source is reliable or not. But hey if you think WTC7 didn't collapse at 911, a whole lot of sites are showing a wrong date. This one was interesting too: http://truthandshadows.wordpress.co...liam-rodriguez/

Maybe it was building 6 I was thinking of when I recalled a story about a building being deliberately demolished, in the aftermath of 9-11. Regardless, I was wrong when I said they demolished building 7 that did, in fact, fall on 9-11. The only problem is that it's nearly impossible to find any website to get a verifiable citation because Google is fucking clogged with a metric-fuck-ton of this god-damned, motherfucking truther bullshit!

You're replying with a citation from one such website and so concludes our discussion while I seek a more stimulating intellectual discourse, replete with cold, hard facts and absent of untethered conjecture in any form, by slamming my head repeatedly in a fucking car door.

___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012

quote:

Originally posted by Trance-MB With "as far as I know" I meant that that is what I have heard on t.v. or read on internet. No way I can check whether the source is reliable or not. But hey if you think WTC7 didn't collapse at 911, a whole lot of sites are showing a wrong date.

And have you read NIST’s report on why 7 collapsed? I bet you haven’t.

___________________