 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Dj Flesch
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Indianapolis, USA
|
|
|
I burn all of my cds--but I also buy quite a lot of music too!
I record all of my vinyl (about 70-80 now) to my hard drive, then burn it on cd. This way, as stated above, I preserve my vinyl collection. Not only this, but several months ago Dj Irish (from www.digitallyimported.com) had his flight case full of vinly stolen or lost on his flight to NYC. I never want that to happen to me, so I make sure that everything I own, I own forever, whether I loose it or it gets stolen, etc.
In addition, I only have one TT and two decks atm, so I don't want to limit myself to spining only one vinyl track in a row.
As I think most people think on this board, it is wrong to burn CDs because you can't afford it, or "because vinyl is getting too expensive". If it is too expensive, then get a better job or a cheaper hobbey.
___________________
When you dance, the DJ takes you on a journey, but he or she is usually not the focus of your experience at a club or festival or wherever you hear the music. Dancing is. Music is.
|
|
May-21-2003 23:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
TranceInMySoul
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Southampton, England
|
|
|
I've been a loyal subscriber to the CD Pool for years, paying to get promos on CD every month. So, I buy quite a few tracks on CD. Then, for everything else, vinyl is the only choice.
I personally would play 100% off CD if I had the time to burn all my vinyl to CD, or if I could actually get the tracks on CD in the first place.
|
|
May-22-2003 17:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
JohnSmith
Agent Smith

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Kamloops
|
|
|
I just posted this on another forum, so it's slightly out of context, but it applies to this dicussion. it was in response to a post by a canadian producer, DJ alucard. Excellent tracks and remixes, really nice guy too. anyway, he was saying something about how it was good that a popular mp3 site got shut down, and i agreed that it was good they closed the mp3 portion, but not the other site.
| quote: |
Regardless of the law, i think sharing mp3s is a GOOD thing. Personally, i'd never heard of DJ alucard, and i'm glad i did. if your songs get pressed on vinyl, then i will buy them. I would NEVER burn your stuff to CDR and spin it to a crowd, unless of course, i had no other way to drop the track.
your point of "if you don't have the equipment, then don't play" is a good one. I bought the equipment, two tech 12s and a mixer, cuz i love this music. I'm a vinyl addict, i can't stop buying them, and i don't even have CD decks. However, some tracks are IMPOSSIBLE to get on vinyl. either they have never been released, or they only had 100 copies pressed and they go for thousands of dollars on ebay or whatever. Or maybe your own fresh track you just finished that afternoon, burned to CD and played that night at a rave. for these, i believe it is OK to play a burned CD.
As for your contention about the 30% of people that steal music, i'd say your probably right, in fact, it could be as low as 10% or even lower. whatever the case, i am in that percentile.
now, consider this. imagine mp3 downloading was completely eliminated (this will never happen, but just for arguments sake, imagine it)
now, that 70% of people that steal music, would be out of luck, and would have none. but those people are leechers, and wouldn't buy it anyway, they just take it cuz it's free. so the record industry loses nothing.
but, those 30% that preview, then buy, would NOT be buying any more! so, the record industry is killing their sales!
Personally, i've bought only a handfull of vinyls that i had never heard before. and most of them SUCK. So i stopped. now i preview the track. regardless of if it's in a live set, a radio mix, a full rip mp3, a crappy only-djs.com preview, i ain't buying without listening!
Who's fault is mp3? the RECORD LABELS. those slimy bastards that sit in their suits and manage talented artists like yourselves, and rake in the cash riding someone elses coattails. it's they're releases of 45 minute "albums" with one good track and eight shit ones, no liner notes whatsoever, and not even well mastered disks, that caused this. then they charge $25, with $0.70 going to packaging and production, $0.30 going to the author of the tune, and $24 going to the labels pocket. This is what caused mp3, and the rise of napster, soulseek, kazzaa, morpheus et al.
and, they will NEVER stop it now. it's like the mythical hydra, cut off one head, and the other 9 will spring forth. the mp3 distribution model is out there, in the minds of millions if not billions. they can never kill it now.
I have further thoughs on this, i will elaborate later, i am at work now.
|
___________________

Visit my site Antiwar Homepage
|
|
May-22-2003 18:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:40.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|