Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Sequencer (Cubase/Sonar) & Control Surface/Mixer - suggestions?
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
CynepMeH
Let me wash your Apple!



Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Miles away from ordinary...
Question Sequencer (Cubase/Sonar) & Control Surface/Mixer - suggestions?

Hey all you Corstens, Buurens, van Dyks! Question: I have cubase sx. so far, I had been using only internal (software) controls. I would like to finally go to "hands-on" approach. I picked up Tascam 1884 but it isn't what I am looking for, as it is hardware recording interface and control surface. I want to stay with RME for recording, so tascam's recording feature is useless to me. Now, in terms of keeping it just as control surface - I think it's a bit over budget. I paid $1100 for it and i think I can get control surface cheaper.

That's not all. I am currently forced to use patch bay to split signal between RME for recording and Rack mixer for monitoring when not using PC. This setup sucks because rack mixer is shit. So, here's my dillema:

How do I control Cubase externally and combine mixing features? one of the suggestions i got was to use Yamaha 01v for control surface and continue to patch to it. There's also yamaha 01vx comming out that suposed to combine hd recording and control surface functions as well - but I don't want to switch to anything from RME. plus, yamaha will use mLAN - I hate mLan implementation.

Anywho, I don't want to get carried away here. Tell me what you use to control your DAW app. and how do you monitor passively?

BTW, I can use Sonar or Cubase - whichever works for me.


___________________
Proud member of the "Filthy Zionist" coalition

Old Post Oct-20-2003 16:10 
Click Here to See the Profile for CynepMeH Click here to Send CynepMeH a Private Message Add CynepMeH to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Scottaculous
habitual line crosser



Registered: Mar 2001
Location: On a plane

Have you considered Steinberg's Houston control surface (Link) or the Mackie Control Surface (Link)?

The Houston is designed for Cubase specifically but the Mackie has a wider application use. I've read some good reviews for the Mackie. The Mackie allows for expansion.

Old Post Oct-20-2003 16:21 
Click Here to See the Profile for Scottaculous Click here to Send Scottaculous a Private Message Add Scottaculous to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
hey cheggy
like a tiger



Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia

As far as control surfaces go for Cubase, I'd definitely have a look at the Mackie Control Universal. 100ml P&G faders.... mmmmm. Works for Cubase SX 1.03 and higher apparently. I was seriously considering getting one untill I realised I have SX 1.01. They're not that expensive either, considering the prices of some control surfaces, and as mentioned, its expandable.

I wouldn't even consider the Houston controller myself. There was a website up a while ago called houstoncontroller or something. I think Stienberg may have had it shut down by now, but it was this huge site made by someone who had experienced heaps of problems with the board. Unacurate and bad customer service for it.

Def have a look at the mackie control, its the same as the Logic control pretty much, only it doesn't work with Logic.

I got a little lost with some of your abreviations, but you mentioned the 01v, so I take it you are looking at getting a digital mixer as well. I'm not too sure how well the digital mixers are configured to software sequencers. I think there is a Digital Tascam that is made for DAWs. The 1884 or something. I forget. There's also the roland si-24 for a digital mixer. I'm pretty sure this is supported by Cubase.


___________________
1 out of every 4 people in this country are mentally disturbed. Look at your 3 closest friends. If they seem okay, then you're the one.

Old Post Oct-20-2003 17:21  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for hey cheggy Click here to Send hey cheggy a Private Message Add hey cheggy to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Tranquil010
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: May 2003
Location: VA/DC Area

Mackie Control


___________________
"Buy Low - Sell High!"

Old Post Oct-20-2003 19:45 
Click Here to See the Profile for Tranquil010 Click here to Send Tranquil010 a Private Message Add Tranquil010 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
CynepMeH
Let me wash your Apple!



Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Miles away from ordinary...

quote:
Originally posted by hey cheggy

I got a little lost with some of your abreviations, but you mentioned the 01v, so I take it you are looking at getting a digital mixer as well. I'm not too sure how well the digital mixers are configured to software sequencers. I think there is a Digital Tascam that is made for DAWs. The 1884 or something. I forget. There's also the roland si-24 for a digital mixer. I'm pretty sure this is supported by Cubase.



That's the Tascam I have now. It's supposed to emulate either Mackie Control or Baby HUI* (russian-speaking ppl, don't laugh)...

HUI* is a russian curse that literally means "Dick"... Every time I talk about mackie, I spell it out : H-U-I, otherwise I crack up...

Baby HUI sounds especially awesome, don't ya think?

anyway, thanks for the tips... I'll check them out.


___________________
Proud member of the "Filthy Zionist" coalition

Old Post Oct-21-2003 00:27 
Click Here to See the Profile for CynepMeH Click here to Send CynepMeH a Private Message Add CynepMeH to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Vizay
immiNspired



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Stockholm & in my mind

I would defenetly go for the mackie sionce it supports not only cubase but almost all good sequencers out there

and when it comes to quality (as far as I've heard) mackie does some really good shit on that front


___________________
quote:
Originally posted by davedresden
i suggest getting the gabriel & dresden prog-a-minute. in 3 easy steps you too could change the face of dance music.

batteries not included.

- dave

Old Post Oct-21-2003 09:05  Sweden
Click Here to See the Profile for Vizay Click here to Send Vizay a Private Message Visit Vizay's homepage! Add Vizay to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio > Sequencer (Cubase/Sonar) & Control Surface/Mixer - suggestions?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

 
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackcan anybody id this easy trance sample please... [2008] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackFilo & Peri - "Juicy 2004" (Filo & Peri's 2004 Mix) [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 13:48.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!