 |
|
|
|
 |
Sean Walsh
JAGERMAESTRO
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
|
|
|
Based on everything I've read on the Access site, the powercore version uses the EXACT same sound engine and algorithms, run on the powercore's onboard DSPs, so the sound quality should be technically exactly the same. Not sure about the protools TDM.
___________________
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."
|
|
Jun-22-2004 12:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
trancenrg69
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2003
Location:
|
|
|
There are few ore difference that Trancemasterbullshitter failed to mention.
First, the poco is modelled after the virus b/indigo models. Compared to the C/KC there are a few differences.
First vioces. c has 32, poco has 16
second moog filters already mentioned
3rd: doesnt have the eq thats on the virus c/kc
4th: the poco is 4 part multimbral (single user license) while the kc/c is 16 part.
5th:mod matrix sources , poco has 3, kc/c has 6
6th:mod matrix destinations poco 6 , kc/c 9
th: more simultaneous FX on the kc/c 16 versus 4 on the poco
It sounds almost exactly the same as the hardware equivalent, but because the virus has its own onboard dac converters, which are different compared to the ones on your soundcard they are slight differences in the sound output, not worse just different. But most of the time you cant tell the difference.
|
|
Jun-22-2004 16:12
|
|
|
 |
 |
alanzo
The Equalizer Womanizer

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Boston, MA
|
|
|
Jun-23-2004 05:50
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|