|
Well although I wouldn't necessarily classify myself as a democrat, I will be voting for John Kerry in November despite my significant lack of enthusiasm for his campaign. It is true that I will be voting "against Bush" rather than "for Kerry." If I weren't living in Florida, I'd probably vote for Badnarik, but while I believe that it is generally better to vote for the best candidate rather than the lesser of two evils, it is my opinion that the threat of a Bush candidacy for four years in which he does not have to worry about being re-elected could potentially make the past four years pale by comparison.
My main problem with the Kerry/Edwards platform isn't so much that I strongly disagree with any of his proposals (except for his support of affirmative action and the war on drugs), it's that his platform doesn't address the issues which really matter to me. A list of "issues" taken from his campaign website reads as such:
| quote: | http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/
Children & Families
Civil Rights
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Health Care
Homeland Security
National Security
National Service
Rural America
Science and Technology
Stronger Communities
Veterans
Women |
"Children & Families" doesn't really inspire me in any way. On civil rights I strongly disagree with him (and his position leads me to question his character). His economic platform sounds good on the surface but is too vague at this point to inspire my confidence. Energy is a good topic but it's really just part of his "Science and Technology" category IMO, it doesn't deserve that much attention on its own - I'm not one of those people crying about my gas prices and at this point I really don't care.
The environment is a good issue but I'm not sure his solutions are the best. Health care doesn't mean much to me, and neither do any of his security/military issues. "Rural America," "Veterans," "Women?" Sounds to me like he's just pandering out to various groups, none of which are me. "Stronger Communities" means nothing to me. I like his platform on Science and Technology, but it isn't in my top five issues.
So basically the issue's he's promising to address aren't the issues that I believe should be addressed. So, while I agree with him on most of his positions, he seems to me to be off the mark with what to be giving his position on.
The issues that are important to me: civil liberties, electoral reform, genuine educational reform, reduced government regulation, stronger seperation of church and state, responsible federal spending, and the elimination of inherently racist "groupthink," are either inadequately explained, glossed over, or ignored entirely in the Kerry/Edwards platform.
Perhaps it's because I'm not really a Democrat which is why his platform "doesn't do it for me." But for a candidate who's supposed to be trying to appeal to independent and politically centrist voters, I don't think he's very appealing at all.
|