|
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
That doesn't really make sense though, because instruments are just a combination of a bunch of oscillators and effects (and yes I understand that subtractors and such don't literally "add" the elements, but the principle is still the same).
Now, sometimes a lead or a synth may be more complicated - it may be a sample, not a synth at all (in which case PvD or Tiesto didn't "create" it either so it's a moot point) - or, it may involve some complex morphing stuff between several samples or synths, but I don't ever remember hearing that type of stuff in a track by PvD or Tiesto.
So, by no means am I criticizing you, but I think that in a way, you're missing the point. It doesn't matter if you're creating an original track or doing a remix, you will always have a certain sound in your head that you need to translate into an audible signal, and it is ALWAYS difficult. If you blast through your original tracks simply by screwing around until you get a sound you like, the tracks are not going to be very good - you have to *think* about your track first and know what you want. IMO, it's the same challenge doing your own or remixing someone else's.
Also, I realize that there are, for example, "remix competitions" on TA where they'll post a MIDI file and have people recreate everything else from scratch. But this particular version of a "remix" represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the term. Think about the word remix - it means mixing again, in a new and different way. By definition this means you already have the original elements, usually in the form of raw audio data that came from the original producer, and you are just cutting them up, rearranging them and adding some of your own elements. What you're talking about is not just a remix, but a reproduction of the track, which is an entirely different beast.
That's just my opinion, though. I thought the thread topic was a little trite so might as well open up a meaningful dialogue here.  |
Thanks man,
no i'm not offended by anything you wrote. A guys has to learn somewhere right and I think their is a lot of good info in you thread. So, thanks. I did mean reproduction, got to get my therms straight. Maybe the point I was trying to make was that a single synth can be slighly limited at times and you would need more to create the right sound. Say if you would want a lead that was punchy bit still warm.
To be honest with you. Before not too long a while ago I just looked for a preset that sounded slighlty in the right direction and changed it a bit. But I just altered things here and their that I thought would make it sound better. I didn't have the complete sound already in my head.
With 'reproduction' you already have the sound you want and you need to recreate it. For me at least, don't know about other people.. this forces me to learn to engeneer a sound more. In stead of just going with something that just sounded good by coíncidence.
___________________
PLEASE RETURN REVIEWS!
C.D.M.P. Website
Review Latest Track; Charlie Delta - Then The Days Where Long
Music is as universal to people as breathing. We've probably been at it since before we even started talking. Immaging two cavemen smashing away at a peace of flint to make a spearhead. It wouldn't take long for them to learn te synchronise the sound. And there you have it, the words first percussive band.
Music has survived wars, famines, the plague and many other things and has evolved with man across many cultures. Dance music is just the next step in the evolutionary chain. My guess is that it will probably be with us untill we are extinced.
|
Remixing very important
