platter actually has a motor, feels more like a real TT.
and it's cheaper.
people just use pioneer CDJs because of the name and because they're the standard the denons are soooo much better
Aug-14-2005 23:24
jdat
Jay Van Dat
Registered: Oct 2001
Location: I dont even know
the only reason I'd get one of the cdjs would be the 1000 because of the card reader
otherwise when comparing these two I say go with denon
Aug-14-2005 23:40
Omega_Blue
Someone Changed My Custom
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Gone
thanks for the replies, the denon did sound a little nicer.
Aug-14-2005 23:43
DJ Elf
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Skåne
I actully thinking of getting the new stanton C.304.. Anyone tried one of those?
___________________
Hardstyle!
Aug-15-2005 00:13
Omega_Blue
Someone Changed My Custom
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Gone
quote:
Originally posted by jdat
the only reason I'd get one of the cdjs would be the 1000 because of the card reader
otherwise when comparing these two I say go with denon
...and what's the card reader all about?
Aug-15-2005 01:35
dj chex
A monkey without a cause
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: denver co
The card reader allows you to save cue points on such on a cf card.
___________________
quote:
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
He who laughs last thinks slowest!
Aug-15-2005 01:50
Stu Cox
Supreme smackaddict
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
quote:
Originally posted by djkoolaide
dns-3000
platter actually has a motor, feels more like a real TT.
and it's cheaper.
people just use pioneer CDJs because of the name and because they're the standard the denons are soooo much better
A motor with fuck all torque... so it actually feels nothing like say a 1210 or TTX-1. The only CD decks that actually feel like vinyl are the Numark CDX and the Technics SLDZ, which both have pretty major flaws, so if you're going to go for a Pioneer or Denon, you should just treat it at a different piece of equipment and learn to use it as a CD deck, not as an imitation turntable.
Scratching (the one thing that should really imitate vinyl as closely as possible) is actually more realistic on a CDJ800 or 1000 - if you make the same movements as you would on a turntable, it does the same to the sound but obviously feels a bit strange because the platter doesn't move. However scratching on a Denon would be like scratching on the cheapest belt drive deck in the world (although at least the needle wouldn't skip).
Personally I'd go for the 800.
___________________
Stu Cox |
Aug-15-2005 11:58
Zild
Ten City
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: San Antonio, US : TXTA #156
I'd get the Pioneer. Just a personal preference.
___________________
I've never been able to eat a whole baby.
Kill the women. Eat the children.
It's just one of those days where you want to bend over everyone you know and kiss their ass goodbye with a big sideways boot.
Originally posted by Omega_Blue
cdj-800 or dns-3000 and why?
So...did u buy one of these or not? Im in the same situation now and this is one of the hardest desicions i've ever had to make. Just cant decide dammit
Aug-30-2005 16:48
jupiterone
housin' guide
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: los angeles
quote:
Originally posted by djkoolaide
dns-3000
platter actually has a motor, feels more like a real TT.
and it's cheaper.
people just use pioneer CDJs because of the name and because they're the standard the denons are soooo much better
Bull. I didnt buy a pioneer because its industry standard i bought it because its quality and i love its simplicity and feel. You dont need the spinning platter its just an annoyance. Yes you can turn it off but its just an annoyance either way. Its belt drive too. I love my CDJ800 its quality i beat that thing to hell and it runs like it did when i bought it.
Sep-02-2005 23:24
Psiweaver
I DJ 120,000 Massives
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Culver City United States
The one nice thing about the denon is if anything where to go wrong its all modular so its easy to get new parts for. The cd drive is also a dvd drive for better durability and a more accurate reproduction.