whats with the ugly crosseyed guy on the front page?? ruins all the quality

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by N|te-L|fe whats with the ugly crosseyed guy on the front page?? ruins all the quality

How does it ruin the quality... it's an amazing emotional moment. He's standing beside his dying father after the massive earthquake that hit Pakistan. These pictures aren't just about beautiful scenery... but it's about capturing "a moment" on film.

that was silly and pointless. some of the pictures were visually poetic but hardly any of them gave enough context to the whole point of the display => the year 2005. you could show them in any year and they'd still have the same effect.

it needed to be more 2005 specific and it was actually depressing seeing most of those pictures of war and death

yeah, some very striking photos but not very representative of the year..some pretty random.

___________________
giggidy giggidy!

I really really liked that very very well done.

___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.

I foudn that very good.
Both editors verison and readers version.

I liked the editor's version the best.

If your interested here is a link to Time's Best of 2005

editor's choice was good but doesnt show 2005.... need more blood! :P