|
| quote: | Originally posted by Dopey
he confirmed it. and why doesn't it make sense? bush and blair caused the deaths of thousands of civilians, if i was a representative of a muslim stronghold i would be spitting out the same rhetoric. |
Let's see:
| quote: | | In fact, the cartoons published in Denmark did not surprise me because the Western states have been waging fierce attacks against Islam for years. These began by humiliation, insults and then occupation. Today they reached the point of ridiculing the prophet. This incident is worse than the 11 September attacks in the US and the 7/7 incidents in London. |
At best described as "fucked up comparison".
| quote: | To be clearer, Denmark is the only European state which practices
racism in the pure sense of the word. There is not a single mosque in the entire Denmark. So how do you explain this my brother? There are many other examples. Worse, Denmark's immigration laws are the worst in the world. |
Blatant lies.
| quote: | I also condemn European states which
republished these cartoons and they are responsible for this act. |
Confusing states with privately owned newspapers. One would expect better from a MP.
| quote: | For instance, if you read British
newspapers published last Sunday, following the demonstrations which were held in London, you would discover that Muslims in Britain represent a danger. This is due to the fierce attacks by the British media which contributed, to a great extent, in helping Blair's government to draft new laws to fight what they call terrorism. |
No. Those people are taken to constitute a danger because of their "protest":
| quote: | [Halimi] Who, specifically, are the states which have refused to deal with Arafat?
[Galloway - shakes his head and says in Arabic]: Brother the game is clear. What do you mean? Britain, the US and Israel are the ones who had refused to deal with Arafat. They had isolated him and called him a terrorist.
|
Camp David anyone?
|
