That's an interesting interpretation. The article states that Israel's actions were a response to actions first taken by Hezbollah and that Israel agreed to a cease-fire.

I guess if you really want to make it an Israeli attack, there's no use in letting the content of the article stop you from saying so.

It's funny you say that, coz I thought that after I posted it, but I couldn't be arsed changing it to reflect more appropriately israeli forces attack militants inside Lebanon etc.
It is a bit misleading, but hey.

quote:

Originally posted by skot_e It's funny you say that, coz I thought that after I posted it, but I couldn't be arsed changing it to reflect more appropriately israeli forces attack militants inside Lebanon etc. It is a bit misleading, but hey.

That's cool, but hey...

"just the facts, mam."

So, this the 2nd time they've invaded lebanon, if I'm not mistaken.