 |
|
|
|
 |
godsendxd
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Brooklyn New York
|
|
|
hmm sounds tempting to purchase lol
|
|
Sep-22-2006 22:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
Rhythm
Emotionotes

Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Indy
|
|
|
Sep-22-2006 23:26
|
|
|
 |
 |
RivalMan
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJFreaq
That's pretty bad. I was hearing some rumors that Cubase SX3/Nuendo 3 could have been a lot faster without the needs for a USB key authorization.
|
Many applications are slowed down by their security checks. The thing with Cubase and Nuendo (according to the "crackers") is that it's insane how many checks they have in the code and that it slows down the app more than 50 %. And one might say: Cubase and Nuendo SX 3 have been cracked anyway, so why does Steinberg even bother spending so much (and slowing down the app) on security in the software? It's always claimed that "THIS time it's really uncrackable" and it's always cracked anyway (or dongle emulated)...
Btw: The "funny story" with an older version of Cubase (VST5 or SX1 maybe) was that Steinberg had a lot of bugs in their version, but a lot of these were fixed by the crackers in the cracked version. So I actually found myself in a situation where I had bought a legit copy of the software, but indeed was using the cracked copy of the same version. It was running more stable. Crazy world... I know it might not have been legal, but I didn't have any moral or ethical issues as long as I'd paid for a copy.
I can understand that software developers feel a need of protecting themselves, but really... I think the Cubase SX 3 example really shows that if someone wants to crack the software - it WILL eventually get cracked.
And I totally agree with you and DigiNut about the FM8 protection. I think it's WAY beyond the line to have an application (bought legally) check for warez on your computer. I sincerely hope that spyware and anti-virus programs will treat this like spyware and thus put pressure on NI to change the behaviour.
I don't get it anyway: How many people will actually pay for the FM8 but use other applications illegally? I think most persons are either freeriders or good, paying customers. Or maybe there are some out there using warez for a month or two, before they go and buy the software - but is that really so bad for the developers?
And on a different note, if software crackers are able to crack high end security and encryption algorithms, they are obviously also able to modify the FM8 so the "check for warez"-behaviour is bypassed. This kind of security check in an application almost screams "please crack me" to all the crackers out there. Think this is a wrong move by NI.
Regards
___________________
RiValMan
- Pumping the bits using:
My beloved MacBook Pro, Logic Pro X, UAD hardware and software and tons of plug-ins...
|
|
Sep-23-2006 10:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
emc^2
FCK MNML

Registered: Mar 2005
Location: 255.255.255.255
|
|
|
The thing about disabling software, I believe at this time it is suposedly capable of killing only NI warez, not other vendors'. However, if this trend catches on, you'd see a lot more music soft companies jump on board to have a unified approach to warez'd software.
I was also dumbfounded by this "feature", as most of the studio computers will not be connected to the internet - so, does that mean that NI are willing to lose business of those "few non-connected" customers, than give it away for free to thousands, willing to download illegal version.
This is all unconfirmed and unofficial at this time but based on what I've seen so far, at the very least this is what it is capable of doing if you plan to run the automated update built into the software.
Basically, here's what I saw:
Upon startup, the software tries to connect to NI website and check for updates. As part of that process (I presume, based on given info), it may have a list of plugins running on your system and at that time it may report them or have them disabled, based on what NI choses to do on their end. Sort of like when XP updates are now pulled to your system, XP update site does a "Genuine XP" validation - you must install XP tool to check to make sure you have a legal copy of XP, otherwise you don't get updates.
I think this "update" feature can be disabled tho, I just don't see NI being soooooooooo strict with its software, considering that warez are known to bring in more business than lost. Sure, few will continue running illegal copies, but most folks who are given a prospect of free updates, plus features like soundbanks or extra goodies may find it worth their investment to buy a legal copy.
Personally, I ran a warezed copy of every major DAW application, before deciding wich one I would want to buy. Simply because the trial ware was either limited or did not give me enough time to convince myself which program would work best for me. After I test drove all apps and determined which one was better, I went out and bought the legal copy and got rid of the warezed versions.
I'll try to get more info about this "feature" though over the next few days and report back.
___________________
| quote: | | No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don’t want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is Life’s change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true. |
--Steve Jobs (1955 - 2011)
|
|
Sep-23-2006 16:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:52.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|