Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
adagio for strings - William Orbit or Tiesto?
I've checked discogs and it's pretty clear that the first original track is by William Orbit labelled as William Orbit - Barbers adagio for strings date: 99. Why is it that whichever live set I see and whenever I see this track listed eslewhere it's titled as Tiesto - Adagio for strings rather than William orbit - barbers adagio for strings(tiesto mix). Tiesto didn't make the song and while he might have remixed it, it doesn't give him the right to have songs mislabelled like that. ?
Mar-18-2007 11:23
Darkarbiter
Psysnob
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne
Re: adagio for strings - William Orbit or Tiesto?
quote:
Originally posted by Drastic_MaN
I've checked discogs and it's pretty clear that the first original track is by William Orbit labelled as William Orbit - Barbers adagio for strings date: 99. Why is it that whichever live set I see and whenever I see this track listed eslewhere it's titled as Tiesto - Adagio for strings rather than William orbit - barbers adagio for strings(tiesto mix). Tiesto didn't make the song and while he might have remixed it, it doesn't give him the right to have songs mislabelled like that. ?
Originally posted by Drastic_MaN
Tiesto didn't make the song and while he might have remixed it, it doesn't give him the right to have songs mislabelled like that. ?
You clueless cretin
It's Barber who wrote it. Both Orbit & Tiesto sampled it, so in fact they did the same thing. No need for asking it to be Tiesto rmx while Orbit can be put as an artist.
Mar-18-2007 11:48
Drastic_MaN
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Cretin? Go fuck yourself. I put a question mark at the end of the sentance for a reason. If the song is by Barbeer then why is it mislabbled by both Tiesto and W.O.?
Mar-18-2007 13:43
Mr.Mystery
Static Guru
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Vantaa
quote:
Originally posted by Drastic_MaN
Cretin? Go fuck yourself. I put a question mark at the end of the sentance for a reason. If the song is by Barbeer then why is it mislabbled by both Tiesto and W.O.?
Because they got the rights to do so. It's not really rocket science, is it.
William Orbit credited Barber in the title of the track, what more can he do?
Mar-18-2007 14:51
SuspicionVandit
Rapper
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: 127.0.0.1
tiesto loves making work his own
wait, i got a better one.
what are you talking about? barber works for tiesto, just lik cor fijman. OMG LOLROFLROFLORLOLO
___________________
Everything is beautiful. Let the music carry you. Baby I will follow you forever. Nowhere else I'd rather be when you're lying next to me. Let the music carry us together.
anti-JennyPie Alliance
SuspicionVandit: Are you God?
Paul Van Dyk 09-24-2009: No, but I can sign your sleeve under that name if you let me!
Mar-18-2007 15:34
isoterra
hi
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Nottingham, UK
you know, for all the years worth of discussion on TA, i'm surprised this topic hasn't been brought up before
Originally posted by isoterra
you know, for all the years worth of discussion on TA, i'm surprised this topic hasn't been brought up before
I'm sure i've seen this being debated before.
Mar-18-2007 16:50
[mart]
PSN: mart_likes_fluke
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: England
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Because they got the rights to do so. It's not really rocket science, is it.
And Tiesto obviously didn't want Barber's name in there, because he thought it might detract from His. Although how he could be that proud of such an abomination is anybody's guess.
Mar-18-2007 17:08
Mr.Mystery
Static Guru
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Vantaa
quote:
Originally posted by SMC
I'm sure i've seen this being debated before.