|
Oh Faux News, you silly jokers are at it again!
An interesting exchange between Faux News' Chris Wallace and John Kerry yesterday in reference to troop withdrawal in Iraq. Here's the transcript that Faux put up between the two:
| quote: | WALLACE: Senator, as you just pointed out, the Senate voted this week and rejected a plan, in part authored by you, by a vote of 48-50 to call to begin the pullout of troops and eventually to set of goal of pulling them out in a year. When you are still...
KERRY: No, Chris, that's wrong. Can I interrupt you there? I'm going to interrupt you there.
WALLACE: Well, let me just ask the question and then you can set me straight on what I...
KERRY: Well, fine.
WALLACE: But in any case, you needed — you were 12 votes short. You weren't 3 votes short. You were 12 votes short of the 60 you would have needed to actually pass this.
When Democrats are still so short, so far away from passing something that will actually force the president's hand, limit his policy, what do you do now?
KERRY: Well, actually, Chris, we're 19 votes short because you need 67 to overcome the veto. And there would be a veto. We all understand that.
But last summer when I brought that resolution to the floor, I got 13 votes, 48-13. That is an enormous change in a very short time.
And what we've learned in the great fights of the Senate and historically in this country is you have to keep fighting. You keep trying.
The Civil Rights Act didn't pass immediately. Important pieces of legislation take time. We will change this policy over time.
But the reason I wanted to interrupt you there is because you and others in the media, and particularly on the Republican side of the aisle, continually characterize the plan we put forward as a complete withdrawal of all the troops and as a precipitous withdrawal.
It is not a complete withdrawal. It specifically allows the president the discretion to leave troops there, to complete the task of training the Iraqis, and that is fundamentally all we ought to be there for.
It allows the president to leave troops there to chase Al Qaeda and prosecute the War on Terror, and it allows him to leave troops to protect American facilities and forces.
Now, six years into the war, really, what more could you want for our troops to be doing? This has got to — this debate has to be real, not a straw man debate where you set up a phony deal which is precipitous and complete withdrawal. It's a responsible plan that allows us...
WALLACE: Senator?
KERRY: ... to stay positioned against Iran and do what we need to protect American interests.
WALLACE: Senator, let me just say for the record, I never said it was a complete withdrawal or a precipitous...
KERRY: Yes, you did. If you go back and look at the transcript, you said all the troops out.
WALLACE: Well, but I never said a complete or precipitous — I also said that it was a goal, not an absolute deadline. But you're right. It is not a complete withdrawal.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,259449,00.html |
Now on the face of it and upon examination it looks as though Wallace is correct - he didn't say a complete withdrawal of all troops and would appear as if Kerry is wrong. The only problem, however, is that somewhat contradicts the video footage of the interview:
| quote: | | WALLACE: Senator, as you just pointed out, the Senate voted this week and rejected a plan, in part authored by you, by a vote of 48-50 to call to begin the pullout of troops and eventually to set of goal of pulling them *all* out in a year. When you are still... |
Have a look yourself. Takes a few minutes but it starts around the 5 minute mark:
http://video.johnkerry.com/video/flash/031807_fns.html
Pretty interesting little scrub job by Faux, ain't it? Anyone really truly floored by this "Fair and Balanced" "news" channel? Anyone? Folks? Hello? This thing on? Bueler?
___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...
|
What else do it do, Opus?
