im thinking bout buying cdjs... i've dreamed all along for a cdj 1000, but found out that the cdj 800 is wayyyy cheaper, and that way i can buy a better mixer too
please spill your mind about 1000 vs 800.... thank you
im thinking bout buying cdjs... i've dreamed all along for a cdj 1000, but found out that the cdj 800 is wayyyy cheaper, and that way i can buy a better mixer too
please spill your mind about 1000 vs 800.... thank you
both are completely useless. no one uses mp3's on cds. if you want to spin mp3's save yourself some money and buy either a couple of cdj1000's or 800's and a digital vinyl interface and software, like serato or torq.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Direct
She indeed is a goddess. I would cut her body in half and hang her upper half in the shower and take her lower and fuck it on my bed.
check out my music @ http://www.xstreamist.com/members/270/audio.php
www.bucke.podomatic.com
Aug-07-2007 23:33
72hrpartyanimal
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: West LA, California (where retired party people live)
Re: Re: cdj 1000 mk3 vs cdj 800 mk2
quote:
Originally posted by bucke
both are completely useless. no one uses mp3's on cds. if you want to spin mp3's save yourself some money and buy either a couple of cdj1000's or 800's and a digital vinyl interface and software, like serato or torq.
what do they use instead of .mp3's??
sorry, just a promoter...
dont know this modern DJ shit...
audiojack and all that stuff...
learn as i go along for the ride!
___________________
Jaded, old fart is me.
Aug-07-2007 23:47
bucke
is bigger than Deadmau5
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: los angeles, USA
Re: Re: Re: cdj 1000 mk3 vs cdj 800 mk2
quote:
Originally posted by 72hrpartyanimal
what do they use instead of .mp3's??
sorry, just a promoter...
dont know this modern DJ shit...
audiojack and all that stuff...
learn as i go along for the ride!
regular cds lol.....or serato if you wanna spin mp3's. a lot of clubs still have cdj1000mk2's as the standard setup, i've never seen mk3's in a club. having that many mp3's on a cd is just not practical, hard to manage the songs and hard to mix imo. and you can't mix 2 tracks on the same cd, therefore if you put a lot of mp3's on a single cd your mixing is very limited. i think the only exception between the cdj1000 mk2's and mk3's is the mp3 capability something which is not very useful. so regarding the original post, you should get cdj1000mk2's. that deck is a classic.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Direct
She indeed is a goddess. I would cut her body in half and hang her upper half in the shower and take her lower and fuck it on my bed.
check out my music @ http://www.xstreamist.com/members/270/audio.php
www.bucke.podomatic.com
Aug-08-2007 00:01
Mecca82
I've seen "The Light"
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
i want to mix cds.. not mp3...
the reason why i ask
a new cdj 800 mk2 vs a used cdj 1000 mk2
u think a used 1000 mk2 is ok? from ebay that i can not test personally
Originally posted by Mecca82
i want to mix cds.. not mp3...
the reason why i ask
a new cdj 800 mk2 vs a used cdj 1000 mk2
u think a used 1000 mk2 is ok? from ebay that i can not test personally
i bought my mk2 off ebay a long time ago and its still working great! i don't think you have anything to worry about as long as you buy from a seller with good reputation, pioneer makes em tough as nails. a cdj800mk2 has mp3 capability, which like i said you really don't need. also the 800 series has one slight different feature than the 1000mk2 and thats the auto loop buttons and loop cutter, which the 1000 series does not. but overall the 1000mk2 has a better feel and better set of features, so definitely go with that.
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Direct
She indeed is a goddess. I would cut her body in half and hang her upper half in the shower and take her lower and fuck it on my bed.
check out my music @ http://www.xstreamist.com/members/270/audio.php
www.bucke.podomatic.com
Aug-08-2007 00:10
72hrpartyanimal
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: West LA, California (where retired party people live)
Re: Re: Re: Re: cdj 1000 mk3 vs cdj 800 mk2
quote:
Originally posted by bucke
regular cds lol.....or serato if you wanna spin mp3's. a lot of clubs still have cdj1000mk2's as the standard setup, i've never seen mk3's in a club. having that many mp3's on a cd is just not practical, hard to manage the songs and hard to mix imo. and you can't mix 2 tracks on the same cd, therefore if you put a lot of mp3's on a single cd your mixing is very limited. i think the only exception between the cdj1000 mk2's and mk3's is the mp3 capability something which is not very useful. so regarding the original post, you should get cdj1000mk2's. that deck is a classic.
okay... i got you...
when you burn .mp3's you can only play it on a computer or some shit...
as opposed to buring the actual tracks (which is like 80 minutes or so)...
i think
___________________
Jaded, old fart is me.
Aug-08-2007 00:15
bucke
is bigger than Deadmau5
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: los angeles, USA
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: cdj 1000 mk3 vs cdj 800 mk2
quote:
Originally posted by 72hrpartyanimal
okay... i got you...
when you burn .mp3's you can only play it on a computer or some shit...
as opposed to buring the actual tracks (which is like 80 minutes or so)...
i think
uh....regular cd's hold 80 mins of music. when you burn actual mp3's onto a cd to be played on a cd player or cdj with mp3 capability your really burning as much data as the cd can hold. i.e. 700mb of mp3 files so you can really store several hundred mp3 songs on a cd.
lol did that even make any sense? sorry i suck at explaining stuff
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Direct
She indeed is a goddess. I would cut her body in half and hang her upper half in the shower and take her lower and fuck it on my bed.
check out my music @ http://www.xstreamist.com/members/270/audio.php
www.bucke.podomatic.com
Aug-08-2007 00:20
djgilla
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Burbank, CA
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: cdj 1000 mk3 vs cdj 800 mk2
quote:
Originally posted by 72hrpartyanimal
okay... i got you...
when you burn .mp3's you can only play it on a computer or some shit...
as opposed to buring the actual tracks (which is like 80 minutes or so)...
i think
That is correct you can play the mp3 cd on any type of device that can read mp3s such as a computer, cd player or a cdj1000mk3 that reads mp3 files from that disk. This is burnt with a maximum of 700mbs per cd. When you burn an audio cd, if it was an mp3 before, it converts it to a wav file that plays in most standard cd players and the mk2 in this example. The limit is 80 mins per disk.
I would go with the MK2 as well. Hard to manage like Bucke said and is a pain to get to tracks you are looking for. Most venues I've come across don't even have MK3's.
Aug-08-2007 00:24
72hrpartyanimal
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: West LA, California (where retired party people live)
Originally posted by djgilla
That is correct you can play the mp3 cd on any type of device that can read mp3s such as a computer, cd player or a cdj1000mk3 that reads mp3 files from that disk. This is burnt with a maximum of 700mbs per cd. When you burn an audio cd, if it was an mp3 before, it converts it to a wav file that plays in most standard cd players and the mk2 in this example. The limit is 80 mins per disk.
Originally posted by 72hrpartyanimal
ahhh i get it...
what about buring prime rib?
thats a totally different story, for another thread
___________________
quote:
Originally posted by Direct
She indeed is a goddess. I would cut her body in half and hang her upper half in the shower and take her lower and fuck it on my bed.
check out my music @ http://www.xstreamist.com/members/270/audio.php
www.bucke.podomatic.com
Aug-08-2007 00:28
R!CH
check signal
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: potrero hill
Re: Re: Re: Re: cdj 1000 mk3 vs cdj 800 mk2
quote:
Originally posted by bucke
having that many mp3's on a cd is just not practical, hard to manage the songs and hard to mix imo. and you can't mix 2 tracks on the same cd, therefore if you put a lot of mp3's on a single cd your mixing is very limited.