|
Re: Re: Re: Trance Chord progressions? is there such a thing
| quote: | Originally posted by mysticalninja
By "immediate response" I assume you mean it will sound good to them? |
Yeah, basically.
| quote: | | As in, you don't have to be a pretentious ass who listens to music for the complexity/scale/chord progession instead of how it sounds to appreciate it? |
Nope. I'm not talking about Schoenberg or microtones here, or dissonance for the sake of being "avant-garde."
Sometimes young kids don't eat anything other than sugary cereal for breakfast. As they grow older, most of them grow out of eating nothing but sugary cereal because they learn to appreciate other foods as well. But some don't.
Music is like that, too. A piece of music doesn't need to be comprehensible or enjoyable to an average four year old in order to be "authentic," and the fact that one isn't comprehensible to a four year old doesn't necessarily make it "pompous" or "pretentious."
It's funny how readily that idea (that only uneducated, inexperienced appreciation is "real") gets bandied about and taken seriously in discussion of music, whereas people would laugh at anyone who suggested that Shakespeare would have done better had he written like Dr. Seuss.

|