|
Re: Back to the Future Part 3.
| quote: | Originally posted by trewqy
Great trilogy imo..but part 3 was totally redundant imo.
In 1885 there were 2 deloreans. One was the "zapped by lightning delorean" in 1955 which happened in part 2.This delorean had the time machine computer all wacked and is faulty.
The other was the one marty brought back from 1955 which had the gas tank punctured.
Now why not just skip the whole train thingy and just patch up the gas tank and just siphon filter the gas from the "lightning delorean" and get on with it.
Time Paradox. | yes as mentioned above, "imo" is redundancy at its best.
i must say though, how back to the future 2 ended was fantastic. when they give him the letter right after doc gets sent back into the past... and then he goes and finds the young doc who just sent him back into the future....
they dont make them like that anymore. so in conclusion 3 was the worst out of the 3, but i still find it to be worth my 2 hours of viewing.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
OOKA-OOKA ME NACHOS ME PRESS KEYS ON COMPUTER GOOD |
|