 |
|
|
|
 |
Dervish
Your opinion matters.

Registered: Dec 2003
Location:
|
|
|
Yeah much as I hate to have to defend the english on this one (scottish not english). It's a heady mix of total lies and class-clash.
I mean "all Englishwomen are intimate with homosexual men" hahahaha
AND IF YOU WANT A DEFINITION OF IRONY:
| quote: | | Oh really, I said. Is that why you all want to come to live in our country, because you feel sorry for us? Now, I am no psychologist, but it is evident to me the antiFrench nonsense that fills the British press is nothing more than envy. They envy us our culture, our food, our small bottoms and our ability to say non to anything that threatens these, be it immigrants, globalisation or the importing of nasty British meat. |
From person who moved FROM FRANCE and lived in england FOR A DECADE!!!!
| quote: | | importing of nasty British meat. | She managed to slate the organic and sourced movement while simulatiously slating the meat have you seen the scabby fly ridden holes they call butchers over there?
This is meant as humour but fuck me.... it's low brow.
"Having no talent for sex (or food), the English make a virtue of their deficiencies." <<< What the fuck would she know has she cheated on her man with an english guy?
Also I'll bet she's doing to old england = britain ignorant bastard move too...
___________________
If you can read this, I'm seriously fucking bored.
|
|
Nov-05-2007 16:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC
|
|
|
Haha, that's ok, Hillary Clinton wants to be French too:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/31/o...xprod=permalink
| quote: | October 31, 2007
Op-Ed Columnist
Hillary la Française, Cherchez la Femme?
By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON
It’s an odd cultural inversion.
The French first lady, the one in a role where wives traditionally ignored and overlooked their husbands’ peccadilloes for the greater gain of keeping their marriages intact and running the Élysée Palace, has fled her gilded perch, acting all-American and brimming over with feelings and feminist impulses.
The former American first lady, the one who’s supposed to be brimming over with feminist impulses, has ignored and overlooked her husband’s peccadilloes for the greater gain of keeping her marriage intact, as she tries to return to the gilded perch and run the White House.
Cécilia Sarkozy acts so American, while Hillary Clinton acts so French.
Cécilia at one point left her marriage to go to New York and seek love American-style, while Hillary lost the public love in the ’90s when she tried French-style health care reform.
In Essence magazine, Hillary sounded très French, très laissez-faire, talking about her marriage. “Now obviously we’ve had challenges as everybody in the world knows,” she said. “But I never doubted that it was a marriage worth investing in even in the midst of those challenges. And I’m really happy that I made that decision. Again, not a decision for everybody. And I think it’s so important for women to stand up for the right of women to make a decision that is best for them.”
In addition to the warrior strategy, the one that led Hillary to back President Bush on the Iraq war and the Iran drumbeat, the senator has a girlfriend strategy.
Hillary recently told an interviewer that they should talk like “two girlfriends,” and last week her campaign theme was: “Women Changing America.” She returns to Wellesley tomorrow to launch Hillblazers, a bid to attract young Hillarys to the campaign. She will be back in the setting of her 1969 feminist triumph as the commencement speaker who described her class’s desire for a “more immediate, ecstatic and penetrating mode of living” and who spoke truth to power, chastising Edward Brooke for being out of touch.
Hillary doesn’t speak truth to power any more. Now that Mark Penn believes women can carry her to victory, Hillary speaks girlfriend to girlfriend.
That tack, Caitlin Flanagan writes in The Atlantic, would only work if she were “willing to let us women in on the big, underlying struggle of her life that is front and center in our understanding of who she is as a woman. Her husband’s sexual behavior, quite apart from the private pain that it has caused her, has also sullied her deepest — and most womanly — ideals and convictions, for the Clintons’ political partnership has demanded that she defend actions she knows to be indefensible. To call her husband a philanderer is almost to whitewash him, for he’s used women far less sophisticated, educated and powerful than he — women particularly susceptible to the rake’s characteristic blend of cajolery and deceit — for his sexual gratification.
“In glossing over her husband’s actions and abetting his efforts to squirm away from the scrutiny and judgment they provoke, Hillary has too often lapsed into her customary hauteur and self-righteousness and added to the pain delivered upon these women.”
That’s French hauteur, of course, the kind Nicolas Sarkozy showed when he called his press secretary an “imbecile” and refused to answer Lesley Stahl’s question on “60 Minutes” about his marriage and ripped off his microphone. He may have failed to realize that, unlike in France, he can’t call his powerful buddies and simply get the story killed.
Hillary surely hopes there is a harbinger in Argentina, where voters just rewarded their former president for his economic prosperity by electing his wife to succeed him.
“And why not?,” former first lady Cristina Fernández de Kirchner said about Hillary yesterday. “Another woman wouldn’t be bad.”
Ms. Flanagan is not so sure. She was particularly bothered by Hillary’s callousness in dumping Socks, the beloved White House cat and best-selling author, on Bill’s former secretary Betty Currie.
But maybe the qualities that many find off-putting in Hillary — her opportunism, her triangulation, her ethical corner-cutting, her shifting convictions from pro-war to anti-war, her secrecy, her ruthlessness — are the same ones that make people willing to vote for a woman.
Few are concerned that Hillary is strong enough for the job. She is cold-eyed about wanting power and raising money and turning everything about her life into a commodity. Yet, the characteristics that are somewhat troubling are the same ones that convincingly show she will do what it takes to beat Obama and Rudy. She will not be soft or vulnerable. She will not melt in a crisis.
And, unlike Obama, she doesn’t need to talk herself into manning up. Obama whiffed in the debate last night when Brian Williams and Tim Russert teed up the first question for him to take on Hillary — something the debate dominatrix never would have done.
|
___________________
|
|
Nov-06-2007 01:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
shaolin_Z
Hei Hu Quan

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, Texas, USA: TXTA #102
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
I think it's obvious why she has sand in her vagina, and I'm not even talking about the poor general hygiene of the French either - it's in one of the first things she says - that men in the UK don't stare at her like they do in France. One, it shows her up for the vain bitch she is (think the wicked Queen in Snow White) and also provides an insight into the pervish and sexist nature of French men. What she said actually makes me feel proud to be English (sorry, Dervish, I meant to say British!) |
Haha, I like how articulated your observation there . It's always boggled my mind how the French can be so much more sexualy liberal and permisive in contrast to other cultures yet simultaneously have such dreadful hygiene. 
___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." -Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller
|
|
Nov-06-2007 01:41
|
|
|
 |
 |
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
|
|
|
Nov-06-2007 09:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
d-miurge
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Unicornland
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
If she don't |
|
|
Nov-07-2007 21:34
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|