but thats about the only reason i visit that site.
Mar-23-2008 05:45
Protege
Just like perfection
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: East Bay
If it werent for beatport, I would just download shit for free so i think its good.
Mar-23-2008 05:50
LionsLair
Suspended User
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles
this thread stinks.
Mar-23-2008 06:29
bas
Stronger Lover
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Here I Am Baby
Ok...
Mar-23-2008 06:32
Ek0nomik
it ain't got that swing.
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: human beings must stop killing other human beings.
While I don't know the whole story behind supporters of Beatport as an early business, they do need to set some sort of standard or quota. Bandwidth is not free, although anyone with some technical background does know that bandwidth is cheap.
Mar-23-2008 06:45
Fresh Prince
Instant Favorite
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: London
I think that the problem is that everyone and their mother owns a label nowadays; I'm unfamiliar with exact business quotas Beatport had set for labels but although variety is good, perhaps smaller labels should unite or release tracks under one guise. Just an idea, that might keep them from falling off their charts, that's if Beatport would allow it.
Mar-23-2008 07:30
Jono404
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
I generally use Trackitdown and audiojelly if i can, beatport prices take the piss now especially on back catalog stuff, do I really want to pay 1.49 for a track that was relased in 1998? Do I bollocks.
Mar-23-2008 07:48
Domesticated
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location:
It's a business you dimwit, of course they need to cut people who aren't making sales.
Do television shows get kept on the air if no one watches?
Although these type of threads are annoying...especially coming from a tranceaddict in training...
Has Beatport explained what the logistics of keeping the underperforming labels in the mix of things are? If they arent saving much money by cutting these people off I think its a mistake. The reason why is that these small labels and small artists actually do a lot of evalgelist word of mouth marketing for Beatport, and pimp the shit out of Beatport just because a few of their tracks are on it. I dont get why Beatport would cut off free word of mouth marketers in exchange for housing their tracks, slowing the growth of the site just because some tunes arent selling. And I dont know if people who do want to stick around are going to pimp their own music around so that their music can stay on Beatport, artists do have a sense of pride and dont want to seem desperate to get their music bought/heard.
I think Beatport reasoning might be too many labels and producers are dumping not that great music into the system so its diluting the quality and making it harder for the consumers (DJ's) to find the good music so if the underperforming artists are dropped off then it would let the good stuff bubble up to the top easier. Also I think they are betting that the artists/labels will step up their promotion game to stay on Beatport, which will help everyone involved.
Personally I support Beatport as an integral part of EDM...I guess we will see how this plays out in the next 6 months.
Last edited by LionsLair on Mar-25-2008 at 08:14
Mar-23-2008 08:41
nefardec
Tranceaddict in tranning
Registered: Oct 2004
Location:
there are really plenty of other sources for buying great music
anyways this thing with beatport has more to do with protecting the integrity of their brand by eliminating labels that release shit music
of course the problem with this is they cut off intentionally small forward-thinking labels as well
and then there are some HUGE labels like paduraru's that release a ton of sub-par stuff.
this has little to do with their 'business' and 'sales' though, because they are essentially cutting their revenue too. Like I said, they want to protect their brand and release high quality, professional tracks.
that said, boomkat.com, traxsource.com, and more are your friends
Last edited by nefardec on Mar-23-2008 at 08:51
Mar-23-2008 08:46
LionsLair
Suspended User
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Los Angeles
quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
there are really plenty of other sources for buying great music
And if those sites hired talented GUI(interface) programmers and artists they would be able to grow their marketshare and bring competition to Beatport. The best part about Beatport is the interface, its what brings in the traffic which in turn brings in the artists and music which in turn brings in more traffic.
Business wise If I was Beatport i would be licensing out the interface/software to other music sites, its awesome to navigate and enticing to purchase from. Actually If I was running Beatport I would make a Beatport for all Indie/Underground music.