Why don't more pro-lifers kill abortion doctors?
The strictest pro-life position says that the abortion of a fetus is morally equivalent to the murder of an adult human being, so we ought to outlaw all abortions. But what happens if we take the premise ("abortion is murder") for granted and draw out some of its implications?
I'd wager that most people, including pro-lifers, believe that it's a good thing to try to stop a murderer from killing any more innocent people. Probably most people agree that you should use as much force as possible in order to stop a murderer, even up to lethal force if that becomes necessary. Further, if the police for some reason refused to stop a murderer from continuing his killing spree, most people would probably be okay with somebody taking matters into his own hands and preventing the murderer from killing any more innocent people, and in fact they might even praise such a "vigilante" if he ended up saving lives.
Now, in the eyes of a strict pro-lifer, an abortion doctor is morally equivalent to such a murderer on a killing spree; he is "murdering" the unborn and will continue to do so as long as he is allowed. The police, however, refuse to stop the abortion doctor from "murdering" fetuses, because such "murder" is currently legal.
The pro-lifers claim that the unborn are just as worthy of protection as any adult. And yet they do not defend the unborn as they would defend an adult; they do not use physical force to stop the abortion doctor from continuing his "killing spree" and "murdering" more innocent unborn children; and if someone does use such force to stop the "killing spree" of an abortion doctor by shooting him, the vast majority of pro-lifers condemn such a "vigilante" as an "extremist" and disavow him.
To sum up -- if pro-lifers believe the following things:
(1) Abortion is the murder of a human being who deserves just as much protection as any adult.
(2) Murderers ought to be stopped from murdering as quickly as possible, even if that means using deadly force.
(3) If legal authorities refuse to stop a murderer from killing or refuse to recognize his killings as "murder," then private citizens ought to take matters into their own hands and stop him.
Then the most logical conclusion is this:
(C) Since the proper authorities will not act to stop the murder of the unborn, private citizens ought to take matters into their own hands and stop it, even if that means killing the murderers (abortion doctors).
In other words, the fact that most pro-lifers aren't out there gunning down abortionists means that either (a) they don't really believe that abortion is morally equivalent to murder or (b) they're too cowardly to try and stop what they view as the "murder" of the unborn using the most immediately effective method.

|