|
Hmm, interesting that you think I was pigeonholing you as just another brainwashed college-age liberal or something, though I suppose that is the image the media would like to suggest for our demographic.
Do not mistake my skepticism as doubt or opposition to your ideas, but rather, hesitance to accept that you truly correlate the aims of either side. Really, they are just labels constituent of very flexible stereotypes, tarnished - as all philosophies must be - by a legacy of constant re-definition; for example, American liberalism and classical liberalism are a gulf apart so far as theory and action are concerned, though I am certain you knew this already. The point I am getting at is that all political systems are marketed to people under the veil of Utopic promises - whether they are claiming that CHANGE is the right course of action, or preservation of the status quo is how we'll achieve anything, politics - in this sense - are similar to religion in that the only way they can move product is to tell people that there is paradise at the end of the tunnel.
With this in mind, is it still difficult to see why conservativism is attractive to some people? Even smart people? You were probably sold your beliefs just the same as the other side - and either can believe what they like, there shall still exist a restlessness in the obtainment of a more successful nation. The true question lies in the methods however, and your beliefs lie in the liberation of social values and breadth of acceptance as well as the strengthening of the central state to the service of the population. What are the pitfalls of this, if any?
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
|