 |
|
|
|
 |
Evolve140
Only Sidechaining a Bit
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Denver
|
|
|
Totally man. I completely agree, well said. If it's groovy and dancable, that works. All of the songs we hear can't be those memorable ones, because if every song is memorable and uber special, if they all get played too much how will they be special anymore if that's all that's being played? a true DJ avoids this naturally with excellent track selection.
|
|
Jun-27-2011 06:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Raphie
Mastering Engineer

Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Lelystad, Netherlands
|
|
|
Not sure if i agree,
i would rather look at the energy in tracks, or call it track class/blocks: you start laid back, build more intensity when DJ'ing along, built up anticipation, some full on and build down again.
But for every "track class/block" you should want to use on the best of the best, why play mediocre tracks if there are better available in that class?
And i think that's what seperates the real DJ's from the crowd. They choose excellent track for each phase of their set, still riding that wave of anticipation, but driven by energy, not by track quality.
___________________
Analogue Mastering
Esoteric sound for the discerning ear
|
|
Jun-27-2011 11:42
|
|
|
 |
 |
Vernon Wanderer
Eye Q'ed

Registered: May 2010
Location:
|
|
|
Re: Are 'memorable' tracks bad for the EDM scene?
| quote: | Originally posted by meriter
You can't play that shit all the time, or for very long. But the filler tracks endure. |
Oh really, now? Those filler standard conveyor belt tracks simply get replaced by others of the kind, while the good tracks stay in people's mind and that's what they associate you with, that's what they go to listen to, not some filler track.
Playing the track over and over again is a DJ's mistake, but even the most persistent ones will eventually stop spinning that record and go with the other things, then fast forward a couple of months/years, when he drops the tune again, people will recognize it and go ballistic.
If you calculate so much about success strategies, and let the outside factors influence your work so much, perhaps you should give producing a rest and "simply" start your own label and be a big boss.
| quote: | Originally posted by meriter
a lot of the small-time local performers here, who seem to have a niche audience of the same people every night |
Kind of renders the thread irrelevant for 95% of the people.
Disclaimer: everything I said is IMO.
___________________
A wise prophet hath once foretold:
| quote: | Originally posted by stealthman
Vernon Wanderer will rediscover his roots back unto wandering vast endless plains miserably....
|
|
|
Jun-27-2011 17:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
Andy28
Sandancer
Registered: Jul 2010
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Raphie
If i need to listen to 5 crap tracks, in order for 1 good track to make a bigger impact, i'll just walk, life's too short...... |
Thing is though, the dj cant please everyone with every single tune, just because your not into the first 5 for what ever reason dont mean other people feel the same and Im sure that playing 5 crap tracks before a good one is not the djs intention when trying to make this "impact". Surely if its a good tune, it will make an impact regardless of what was played before it.
|
|
Jun-27-2011 20:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
skyhunter
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Sep 2010
Location:
|
|
|
In the UK Hardcore/Hardcore Happy sets I listen (and glowstick/string) to, there aren't too many "filler" tracks that I hear. You have your cheesy remixes of Tune Up!, Styles and Breeze, Ryu Ryu, everything. Now I know hardcore is way different then what most/all of you listen to but still.
I like these sets. I don't listen to them nonstop, but I enjoy them and a considerable portion of the older hardcore scene do too. Plus these are also what give the rest of the EDM scene a giant blanket to outsiders of our culture. You can thank Basshunter and me for that :P
In the more underground stuff, if you can call house/dubstep underground anymore, I can see this making sense, but to the wider audience that doesn't listen to EDM much it's horrible. If someone isn't interested in a set they hear on Youtube they are 1 click away from leaving.
In person, go ahead with the suspense tactic I'd say, not many people (except Raphie and his comrades, I salute you!) will just walk out of a club or venue if they dislike what's being played.
Just IMO
___________________
Tranceport is the best album ever....
There is nothing wrong with being musically diverse. 
My Soundcloud
|
|
Jun-27-2011 21:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
Normie
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2011
Location: Topock, AZ
|
|
|
Going out on a limb here, but different tracks are memorable to different people for different reasons.
I couldn't tell you the lyrics of any rap song to ever break a million in sales, but I know the lyrics/melody etc to dozens of tunes people have never heard of.
The better the track, the better the odds that more people will find it memorable. But again, personal preference will win out. Everyone likes different things for different reasons.
|
|
Jun-27-2011 23:35
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
Re: Are 'memorable' tracks bad for the EDM scene?
| quote: | Originally posted by meriter
the filler tracks endure |
I have to admit, I found this comment amusing. Yes, the filler tracks end up on all the compilations, and years later they reappear on the "trance classics" compilations.
Forget songs like "Flaming June", the filler tracks are the ones that endure...I must be listening to music totally wrong, I always seem to go back to the songs with memorable melodies...
|
|
Jun-28-2011 00:55
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|