|
| quote: | Originally posted by Nightshift
depends. do you need sound isolation? the 701/702 are open back designs while the 271 are closed back design.
however - the headphones you are trying to compare are in two seperate classes.
i feel that you should actually be comparing the 271 with the 240 because the 240 is a semi-open back designed headphone used as a studio standard for 30+ years and the 271 is said to be its closedback counterpart.
i cant vouche for the 271 but i have owned the k240 for a year and [after vigorous burning in] these things are flat as a board and super transparent like you're listening to monitors intstead of headphones. even the sub bass has that realistic feeling about it that really lets you monitor down low to about 15hz quite accurately. i have found that since having these, burning them in and learning them, you can get a mixdown there about 98%, just having to check the sub frequencies and ultra highs for out loud consistency and balance mainly.
since the 271 is said to be the closed back mimics of the 240 i would recommend them (i havent heard them though), but if you dont need isolation then i would recommend the 240
just my 2cents |
bullshit, bass so close to the ears is always going to be a difficult judge, and i highly doubt they are flat as a board, i know the 271s have a dip around 150hz, i dont need a chart to tell me that.
if i were u i would try to get a listen to both cans and see which you like more, i havent used the 701's. both of these type of cans are good for clarity in the mids upper mids and highs. semi open are more ideal, get the 701s if u can. and when i say 701's i mean the 702 because of the detachable cable.
and note, 271mk2 are made in china, where as the 701/2 are made in austria i believe still.
Last edited by MSZ on Dec-13-2011 at 06:30
|