question about nothing returning mix and for an angel
the for an angel and e-werk club mix are exactly the same
so are james holden nothing and the returning 93 mix
whats what?
___________________
soulful/latin/deep house + jazz
Mar-09-2003 00:10
Technaut
tuanhceT
Registered: Nov 2001
Location:
___________________
Mar-09-2003 00:13
mndeg
;0
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: IL, United States
^
wtf ?
___________________
soulful/latin/deep house + jazz
Mar-09-2003 00:14
Ibiza Dreams
Chroma
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: In yo mouf'
Nothing
I think you're right about the For An Angel E-Werk mix being the same as Original... there might be slight differences, all I know is that E-Werk was a club Paul van Dyk spun at.
However, Nothing (Original) and Nothing (Returning 93 Mix) are very different. The original has the clear vocals while Returning 93 mix has the extremely distorted ones... this is apart from the track being completely diffeerent of course.
To see which track you have, listen for the vocals OR listen for that very unique rolling bassline characteristic of Returning 93 mix... also Original mix is around the 7 minute mark, while Returning 93 is around the 9 minute mark.
Original is alright, but Returning 93 is a breath of fresh air for the trance community... I love it.
___________________
When I turn on my mixer, drop the needle, and put on my headphones... nothing else matters.
I am a DJ.
Mar-09-2003 00:20
mndeg
;0
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: IL, United States
i think my returning mix was named original
___________________
soulful/latin/deep house + jazz
Mar-09-2003 00:22
TeKnoHe@d2025
Derek Howell Addict
Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
i think my returning mix was named original
When the tune was first released it was named Mix 1 and Mix 2. Mix 1 was the original with normal vocals, and Mix 2 was the one with distorted/almost backwards vocals. So Mix 2 = Returning 92 Mix
I don't know if that was what was causing confusion or what, but it should clear that problem up for someone in the future
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: somewhere southeast of hell
quote:
Originally posted by mndeg
i think my returning mix was named original
the original mix has a xylophone type sound in it.
Mar-09-2003 00:31
Az
took me all the way back
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Walking to John O'Groats for some spastics
the vocals in the 93 returning mix are excellent
Holden has a real knack for cutting vocals, and starting them at different points, without making them sound shite
it's harder than you'd think
Mar-09-2003 00:32
mndeg
;0
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: IL, United States
i think return93 mix is what my mix 2 of nothing is
edit: above guy was right
___________________
soulful/latin/deep house + jazz
Mar-09-2003 00:33
bundantoh
tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: upland, ca, usa
e-werk and the original are different, if you listen to them back to back. i have the 45 rpm cd......but yea. they have subtle differences
Mar-09-2003 06:05
victor
P A R T YY? coz we gotta!
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Montréal
quote:
Originally posted by bundantoh
e-werk and the original are different, if you listen to them back to back. i have the 45 rpm cd......but yea. they have subtle differences
still dont see the diff
Mar-11-2003 05:57
Mr.Mystery
Static Guru
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Vantaa
quote:
Originally posted by Az
the vocals in the 93 returning mix are excellent
Holden has a real knack for cutting vocals, and starting them at different points, without making them sound shite
it's harder than you'd think
It's damn near impossible... I tried it and it didn't quite sound like Nothing
...but yea. they have subtle differences
