 |
|
|
|
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
me personally - i dont plan any songs. if it happens it happens. if it works. it works. if not. i try again until it does. usually the only premise ill start from is a feeling. usually if i hear another song which i love or ive had a great night out or something which just gets me fired up and happy - ill sit down and try to put some of that energy into a song. i dont consciously think it at the time. it just feels like the best time to write a song (when you are overflowing with ideas and you quickly wanna sketch out some of them before you lose them). i prefer to work on impulse because the occassions in which i have thought out a song from the beginning to the end, ive tended to overwork things. nothing i write ever goes to plan. i never recreate THAT sound in my head. i often end up chasing those ideas, failing to realise them, and ultimately some of the tunes i end up with as a result have a kind of energy aswell. just a different kind of energy and one that was not intentional. i guess you could say i work by stumbling from accident to accident.
when i used to do painting i would never plan out a picture. i wouldnt really even think about it and i wouldnt really be able to visualise the end product at the start. even if i did - i guarantee it would turn out differently. and id find something i like about that difference. and get carried away with that. etc. etc.
i think its both a blessing and a curse that we cannot perfectly get that sound in our head. i get the impression it would become sterile. i think what i like most about songs and one which i find the hardest to achieve is the accidental qualities. the unforseen elements of a song that just 'work.' a drum and bass breakdown where the drummer accidentally hits a snare late and it tumbles into the next phrase. sometimes it just sounds great and you neverp planned it or thought to do it.
|
|
Feb-23-2005 01:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
J.L.
Never gonna give you up.

Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
|
|
this may seem simple and not really worth saying...
but name your track before starting to produce. And instead of naming it like a generic trance tune name, for ex. "Forgotten love", or "Last Call" or "Destiny" or whatever, try coming up with something imaginative. For example "Northern Wind", "Desert Sun", "Hyperdrive", "Rhythmic Pulse", "Inner Sanctum", "Aerodrive", "Heart of the Jungle" or something that gets you an idea of the atmosphere you want to create.
I say this again, but too many people are producing the same unimaginative fluff that you hear making up trance because they figure they listen to the music, pick up a copy of reason/FL... and think they can be the next great producer...
Being a good producer takes a lot more than having an idea in your head (although it helps)... you need inspiration to learn to try new things that haven't been done before, be willing to push new boundaries... to explore new emotions.. new atmospheres.. new styles.. new ideas...
Make whatever you want to produce... Don't make what you hear... Don't say I produce ____ genre of music... Just produce whatever you feel is right...
The other things such as composition, synth programming, mixing, etc.. you will learn in time... but inspiration is one thing you cannot learn... but you have to be willing to accept new challenges to further yourself as a producer
|
|
Feb-23-2005 04:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
Derivative
Bipolar Bear
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
|
|
|
| quote: | So you have a feeling that you want to make come from your sound, but where do you go from there? How do you go about reporducing that feeling with your arrangement. This seems like something that would vary depending on the particualar idea behind the song, but in general, how do these projects flow from an idea of a feeling to a finished track? I guess I need more detail about how one goes about stumbling from accident to accident in the right direction.
Do you write your melodies or program your synths first? Do you devide the production process into any sort of phases or do you really just throw everything together on a whim? |
i should really clarify. the feeling is just a spark. it gets the ball rolling. it sometimes changes whilst im working and sometimes by the end its a completely different feeling you get from the track. i dont really set out to reproduce a specific feeling but a feeling is normally the precursor the tunes i write. like i said, if i go out and hear some amazing tunes, it makes me want to write a song and it really motivates me to quickly try and capture that kind of energy. very good frame of mind to be in when you write a tune i think.
as for the order in which i do things. again - it varies. most of the time i will break everything down into little chunks because it makes things easier. ill normally go and write a kick drum and a bassline first then some hats. sometimes ill start making atmospheres and pads. sometimes ill have a really great idea for a riff and quickly get it into floops before i forget. theres no specific order that i adhere to all the time. again thoguh, working by this method can be hit and miss. you capture something with each little bit you start working on. overall im a bundle of ideas but am still figuring out how to get them all to work in a song and keep it tight.
i definitely divide production into phases. i will usually always work on drums in a separate flp file. ill take the kicks from the drum and in another flp file work out kick and bass combinations. ill do my leads in a separate flp and my pads. i have to do this because my PC cant handle the strain of me doing everything in one flp. so this is born out of necessity. if my PC was fast enough that i could do everything i do in realtime then i would probably be more spontaneous with regards to doing the works in a single flp in a short period of time.
i differ to kewlness in the sense that i always name songs after i write them. rather than try to chase a feeling or an atmosphere and try to recreate that feeling (which is never exact) ill write a song which started with some ideas. grew into something very different. then ill listen to the song and give it a name that feels most appropriate to how it sounds. im not saying this is a good way to work though - its just how i do it. however, i should say that my work is nearly always incomplete and theres nearly always somethign wrong with it.
|
|
Feb-23-2005 06:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zombie0915

Registered: Jul 2001
Location:
|
|
|
Here are some quotes I dug up that sort of answer my questions
"Basehead - First i try to get an idea in my mind, some kind of mood for a
song. Then i throw some samples into ST3 that i think fit that
mood.. usually i fill 30-35 sample spaces. Then i spend a few
minutes, coming up with some kind of main chord prog/theme/hook
etc.. then i come up with an intro part in one of the next few
patterns.. and slowly build into the original pattern i wrote.
after that, i just keep advancing and doing variations on the
original.. and often make 2nd or 3rd parts that go well with the
first"
"Leinad - I usually decide which samples to use first. That can take alot of
time. I try to do most of the samples myself. Then I just down and
punch out some simple drums to have a base to build on. I try to get
some chords into action and start fiddling with the effects far too
early Smile After that I try to grasp the whole thing and decide where
the refrain should come, do the intro etc and add lead instruments
with all kind of effects needed. Then back to the drums again and
adjust the volume levels of everything so no instruments "drown" the
others and I try to vary the drum patterns so it won't get too
booring. And the the though part, give the whole thing a name Smile
Ofcourse I always try to do everything at once though Surprised"
"Nemesis - Well, I have a few ways actually... The most common is where I
load up a few chords and play around with them until I get
something that sounds pretty decent, or catchy, and then I build
up from there... Usually after the chords come the drums, and
then the bass and after I get a few patterns down, I start
writing an intro, and then a "B" part or the "A" part if I think
the existing patterns fit the "A" part better.."
|
|
Feb-24-2005 22:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zombie0915

Registered: Jul 2001
Location:
|
|
|
More searching brings more answers to quote:
| quote: | ive been struggling with this process for awhile as well. mostly because the majority of my songwriting skills up to this point were developed in the context of a punk power-trio, and i could quickly compose and play whatever jam came to mind on guitar, and the drummer and bassist would add their own parts accordingly. manipulating a sequencer, 2-3 synths, a drum machine, a sampler, and multiple effects all on my own doesnt come with the same immediate expressiveness.
that said, this is the technique ive come up with so far:
as soon as i get a jam in my head i compose the basic parts as quickly as possible before i forget it, drums first, then main synth, then whatever other elements might be of importance.
then i switch to working on shaping the sounds to their basic ideal characters. this involves getting the right drum samples, the right waveforms on the synths, basically outlining.
then back to songwriting: i try to come up with a good intro to lead into the jam i came up with, usually introducing a secondary melody and a sample or two to accent the build.
after creating a somewhat even transition from intro to jam, i give all the sounds another working-over. i get a great deal more specific about honing all the instruments, making everything sound smooth, adding effects, adding filters (and automating their movements if necessary). everything should be sounding about 75% of the way towards the way i want it by now.
back to songwriting: i compose whatever naturally follows the main jam, maybe a short second breakdown (this is where i have fun using my verse-prechorus-chorus-bridge-solos sequence writing skills), and compose a basic outro (something that i wouldnt mind mixing out of, basically).
back to sounds: i give everything a complete fine-tuning, and i add fills and effects everywhere possible in order to give character and keep things from sounding monotonous.
then comes the mixdown. i am still in the early stages of learning how to do a proper mixdown, so ask someone else |
the advice is starting to get really good, keep it coming if you can think of anything else that is helpful!
|
|
Feb-25-2005 18:46
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|