 |
|
|
|
 |
AnomalyConcept
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Chicagoish, USA
|
|
|
Serato will only let you play your music from your computer (no burning CDs, pressing vinyl, etc.), which in itself is very convenient.
It won't, among other things, magically make your decks better. If you have turntables or CDJs that don't hold pitch well, that may pose a problem (not sure if Serato or the like have pitch locking/correction/etc.).
|
|
Jan-24-2007 19:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
DjWoody
Chingon

Registered: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles (OC) / Mexicali
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by AnomalyConcept
Serato will only let you play your music from your computer (no burning CDs, pressing vinyl, etc.), which in itself is very convenient.
It won't, among other things, magically make your decks better. If you have turntables or CDJs that don't hold pitch well, that may pose a problem (not sure if Serato or the like have pitch locking/correction/etc.). |
Serato DOES let you play from every source. If you're using vinyl, and someone comes over and hands you a CD, just pop it in your laptop and Serato will recognize it. You can then map the track to either Deck A or B and do the adjustments with the turntable or CDJ.
Also, if you're using Serato with CD's, you can switch to regular CD's by flipping the line switch in your mixer. Same goes for vinyl.
Serato DOES HAVE Pitch Lock/Master Tempo. It's included on the new version 1.7. They are also working on the PITCH AND TIME PlugIn which is unavailable to any other vinyl emulation software.
Serato also announced that they will support VIDEO and MIDI in the near future. They even showed a demo video of some guy using it with video. Now that's AWESOME!!!
In the past I have used Final Scratch, and I messed with Torq before. Honestly, Final Scratch was garbage! Their support team sucks, and you had to pay for updates. With Serato updates are always free. Look, they update their software every other month. They just released version 1.7 yesterday and they are already talking about Beta Testing 1.8. Also, Final Scratch 1.1 was very buggy and it didn't sounded too good. FS 2 was supposed to be better, but I switched to Serato. Native Instruments (the software partner for FS) even abandoned Final Scratch and started their own program TRAKTOR SCRATCH. Why? Cuz Stanton has issues.
Torq feels cheap, confusing, and the interface isn't all there. There's some cool features, but it's just not the same. Serato is a workhorse, and very reliable. I only had it crashed on me ONCE! And that was while playing at Spundae. Why did it crashed on me? It wasn't Serato... it was my laptop!!!
If you have any questions let me know.
|
|
Jan-24-2007 20:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
Noctone
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Lincoln, NE, USA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DjWoody
Torq feels cheap, confusing, and the interface isn't all there. There's some cool features, but it's just not the same. Serato is a workhorse, and very reliable. I only had it crashed on me ONCE! And that was while playing at Spundae. Why did it crashed on me? It wasn't Serato... it was my laptop!!!
If you have any questions let me know. |
To be honest, this really sounds like SSL fanboy talk. You haven't offered any substantive reason why Torq is bad. In paraphrase, "I don't like it" is what I get from you.
___________________
'People cling to their rotten memories, to all their misfortunes, and you can't pry them loose. These things keep them busy. They avenge themselves for the injustice of the present by smearing the future inside them with shit. They're cowards deep down, and just. That's their nature.'
-Louis-Ferdinand Céline
"Journey to the End of the Night"
|
|
Jan-24-2007 22:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
DjWoody
Chingon

Registered: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles (OC) / Mexicali
|
|
|
I am a serato fan, but by all means I'm a fair guy. I give a fair chance to all. Torq's cheap plastic box was a big issue for me. Why? Because I carry my box all the time and i'm paranoid to it cracking, breaking, or anything else like along that line. The Serato box is made out of metal, it's rugged, and it's taken a true beating from me.
Also, the Torq software is a bit confusing. It's not as clean or straight forward as Serato's. That's also huge for me since when Im djing I dont have time to look at a confusing interface.
Don't get me wrong, there are some thing I do like about Torq. I like the fact that you can control it with any midi controller including the trigger finger. I like how you can add VSTs to it. But when I messed with it at Remix Hotel, quite honestly, I wasn't impressed at all. It's a good runner up for Serato, but IMO it's not all there. It feels like a toy.
IMO, one that will be worth considering would be Native Instrument's TRAKTOR SCRATCH...


|
|
Jan-24-2007 23:14
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|