 |
|
|
|
 |
woscar
Starstuff

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Guatemala, Guatemala
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Paradox Lost
I believe it was the Renaissance mix comps that were released in the early 2000's that comprises the earlier volumes, even though they weren't titled as such.
Remember these:
Dave Seaman- Renaissance: Awakening
Deep Dish- Renaissance: Ibiza
Dave Seaman- Renaissance: Desire
Nick Warren- Renaissance: Revelations
Then came Hernan Cattaneo's first Masters installment, and I think it was at that point in which they just assigned them with the term "Masters." So technically, Hernan's first mix comp in this collection was actually the fifth in the overall series.
Both parts of Nic's Renaissance mix comps weren't part of the "Masters Series," and they're just categorized as a "Renaissance Presents..." release (like Sequential, vol 1 + 2, and Zabiela's mix comps).
As confusing as it may be, I think it's a little worse considering that they also seemed to throw in the word "Part" in a few of them, but looking at it as a whole, the numerical progression makes sense. |
Yeah, pretty confusing...there's another Cattaneo one called 'Renaissance Masters Series, Vol.2'.
Thanks for clarifying...I have those 4 early ones but I didn't know those were part of the series.
Anyways, here's the cover 

___________________
My Set Archive - MY BLOG
|
|
Feb-15-2008 03:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
Paradox Lost
In This Twilight

Registered: Aug 2007
Location: San Francisco
|
|
|
Yeah, it's his second volume, but it makes it appear as it's the second Volume in the overall series. But if that's the case, shouldn't Dave Seaman's last comp a couple of years ago have been "volume 2," with this one being "volume 3?"
...and Satoshi's and Sandy's is "Part 8," and "Part 9" respectively, so I guess they're reserving "volume" for those who have multiple installments, with "part" being the actual number in the catalog...which would make this most recent one "Dave Seaman- Renaissance: Masters, Part 10, volume 2?"
Okay, I'm through trying to make sense of it. It's pretty apparent that they now have a much more specific understanding as to what they want to do with this series, so I suppose it's just too late and too impractical to make them consistent with the ways the older releases were titled.
The cover images are always exceptional (starting with Hernan's second installment), especially Satoshi's installment. It really makes it appear analogous to opening up a box of fine chocolate, reserved for a special occasion, and their consistency in quality sure makes it an appropriate analogy. 
Last edited by Paradox Lost on Feb-15-2008 at 04:12
|
|
Feb-15-2008 03:55
|
|
|
 |
 |
woscar
Starstuff

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Guatemala, Guatemala
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Paradox Lost
Yeah, it's his second volume, but it makes it appear as it's the second Volume in the overall series. But if that's the case, shouldn't Dave Seaman's last comp a couple of years ago have been "volume 2," with this one being "volume 3?"
...and Satoshi's and Sandy's is "Part 8," and "Part 9" respectively, so I guess they're reserving "volume" for those who have multiple installments, with "part" being the actual number in the catalog...which would make this most recent one "Dave Seaman- Renaissance: Masters, Part 10, volume 2?"
Okay, I'm through trying to make sense of it. It's pretty apparent that they now have a much more specific understanding as to what they want to do with this series, so I suppose it's just too late and too impractical to make them consistent with the ways the older releases were titled.
The cover images are always exceptional, especially Satoshi's installment. It really makes it appear analogous to opening up a box of fine chocolate, reserved for a special occasion, and their consistency in quality sure makes it an appropriate analogy. |
Yeah, most confusing series ever...LOL
It annoys me, specially since if fucks up the sorting on my iPod
Speaking about Satoshi's...I really hope this one is as good as that one. Satoshi's was an exceptional piece of music 
___________________
My Set Archive - MY BLOG
|
|
Feb-15-2008 04:11
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:42.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|