Any opinions? I am currently waiting my 360 to be repaired. however, i was really tempted to buy a PS3. Are there actually any major differences??
price wise the PS3 is a lot more....cheapest i can find it at is $680!
Apr-01-2008 01:51
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
whichever has the most games you wish to play.
___________________
Apr-01-2008 02:03
christos
P.A.N.A
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: 42
ps3 of course. why buy a console that doesn't support bluray out of the box, and where you have to pay to play online?
___________________
spacetribe!
Apr-01-2008 02:35
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by christos
why buy a console
got it in one.
___________________
Apr-01-2008 03:03
christos
P.A.N.A
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: 42
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
bluray. got one in it.
fixed.
Exactly mate!
___________________
spacetribe!
Apr-01-2008 04:27
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
i heard there are no split-screen games yet for the PS3. so its really only a family entertainment system if there's no more than 1 person in the family?
___________________
Apr-01-2008 04:33
00soups00
cruzin
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
i heard there are no split-screen games yet for the PS3. so its really only a family entertainment system if there's no more than 1 person in the family?
or they dont play Racing/FPS games
Apr-01-2008 05:13
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
Its still fucking retarded.
___________________
Apr-01-2008 05:14
Aesthetic
- ---(ps3.addicted)--- -
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: somewhere between the melody and the pads
pkc you lie.. i have warhawk and it is split screen + online multiplayer.. plenty of car games are also split
mind you the reason you would buy a ps3 over a 360 today is probably bluray.. you get a player and a ps3 in one, and the ps3 is up the top with the best of the bluray players too
in terms of console vs console for games theyre both on par and the 360 is even coming out on top with ports, but i bought a ps3 because sony just knows how to make a console.. theres so many more games that are going to be available on the PS3, opposed to the million first person shooters on the 360. That and the fact that the xbox brand just isn't that strong yet really.
By the end of this year the ps3 will be outselling the 360, and it was released nearly a year later. Speaks volumes doesn't it.
Registered: May 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
We have both.
Funnily enough the 360 is solely for games, the PS3 is solely for blu ray and the media capabilites.
So far the games on the 360 are heaps better than whats on PS3 but that may change in the future.
PS3 is a better package overall imo tho.
Apr-01-2008 06:04
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Aesthetic
pkc you lie.. i have warhawk and it is split screen + online multiplayer.. plenty of car games are also split
only going off what ive heard, burnout no longer has split screen tho which i thought was pretty shitty.
___________________
Apr-01-2008 06:05
christos
P.A.N.A
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: 42
gt5 is 2 player and 16 player online
fifa 08 is 8 player on screen and online
Unreal tournament is multiplayer online
Cod4 is 2-4 (can't remember) on screen and online.
then there's army of two (2 player cooperative for the whole game) which is an awesome concept.
All online games play extremely well, which has suprised me.
is 2 player and 16 player online
