 |
|
|
|
 |
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
|
|
|
Re: Waldorf Q vs. Microwave XT
| quote: | Originally posted by cryophonik
BTW, before you suggest it, I'm not interested in a MicroQ or a Blofeld - having lots of dedicated knobs is a prerequisite for me. :wink: |
i second that. got microQ and its abit pain to program and i have some problem with midi-editor progs. might sell it all and get the Nord Rack 2X instead. not sure tho caus i love the sound of it and all its functions.
|
|
Aug-01-2008 19:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zak McKracken
Trance
Registered: Jun 2003
Location:
|
|
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by cryophonik
i had 3, i didnt realy like it as much as i hoped, so i sold it. samples ive heard from 2X is much more "solid??" so i might want the 2X caus i realy loved the clavia way of doing stuff.
|
|
Aug-01-2008 22:30
|
|
|
 |
 |
derail
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
|
|
I love the sound of the NL3, I have to say. Smooth and beautiful. To each their own I guess. If I see a cheap 2X I'll be tempted to add that though.
But the discussion is about Waldorf Q and Microwave XT. I have the Micro Q and the XT. For trance, the Q is a better bet, but since you already have a Virus, I'd say the XT would give you a much more "different" sound. They've probably come down in price since the blofeld came out (that's supposed to basically be kind of a Q, XT and more all rolled into one, in a neat little package? I know I'm simplifying it, but I'd really like to try one out sometime. I've got three Waldorf Synths - I also have the Pulse, which is also able to generate some excellent sounds for trance).
I probably haven't dived into the XT as much as I could have, but I didn't find it immedicately accessible for my style of trance. Some very interesting, "different" sound capabilities in there, but definitely not a "first or second/ bread and butter" type of synth. Some nice bass sounds, lots of modulated, special effect kind of sounds, quirky sounds...it seems to have a decent amount of midrange compared to some other synths....maybe read some harmony central user reviews, if you've owned a few synths you can generally get a good impression from what people say on there...
It's kind of hard to make a recommendation. Overall I'd generally recommend the Q, but they're very different synths. If I were you I'd stick with the 2X...heh heh heh, I feel so helpful...
|
|
Aug-02-2008 07:28
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:38.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|