I think that tutorials and recommendations are two different things. You can watch tutorials to learn new techniques, understand your tools better, etc. and apply those techniques and tools to your own compositions. To me, that's not the same thing as a recommendation by the other producer that you should use those tools/techniques.

In my mind, the only thing that you should do is what you think works for your song. That's one of the reasons I hate (and usually ignore) comments from other forum members who say things like "...you need to add this, or you need to change that...". That's total BS - we don't need to do anything with our songs just because someone else says so - they have no idea what your vision of the song is. That's not to say that their suggestions are no good, but they aren't necessities. So, my advice is to just take recommendations for what they're worth, consider the person making them, and consider if it fits your vision of your track.

___________________
cryophonik.com | facebook | soundcloud

Sonar Platinum | Ableton Live 9 | Logic Pro X | Access Virus TI2 Keyboard | Kurzweil PC3X | Nord Lead 4R | NI Maschine

Well, i really think it depends on what you do with the information extracted from any tutorial.
You can just copy and apply it to your track (if it works) or you can use the information and take it as a foundation for an extended approach (something the original author wasn't thinking about).
So, it doesn't hurt to know what others do, it could be helpful in another way.

quote:

Originally posted by cryophonik I think that tutorials and recommendations are two different things. You can watch tutorials to learn new techniques, understand your tools better, etc. and apply those techniques and tools to your own compositions. To me, that's not the same thing as a recommendation by the other producer that you should use those tools/techniques. In my mind, the only thing that you should do is what you think works for your song. That's one of the reasons I hate (and usually ignore) comments from other forum members who say things like "...you need to add this, or you need to change that...". That's total BS - we don't need to do anything with our songs just because someone else says so - they have no idea what your vision of the song is. That's not to say that their suggestions are no good, but they aren't necessities. So, my advice is to just take recommendations for what they're worth, consider the person making them, and consider if it fits your vision of your track.

Good point there Cryo

me personaly i like to try and recreate a certain bassline or lead etc just to polish up on my sound design, it's a little satisfying know that i can create those patches.


I also like watching tutorials as you do learn different techniques if you already dont know how to create them/ every day is a school day. (a long time ago lol.


I don't see the harm in recreating the structure of a sound or arrangement from someone else, but it's also good to have your own style and sounds.

___________________

I think producing is a lot like dancing in that it takes a while before you can produce with your own unique style. When you start out, you're not really trying to completely reinvent the wheel; you probably copy someone very influential and as you go along you pick up new and different techniques. You keeps the ones you like, and drop the ones you don't. At the end you have something unique that is totally your own.

Stephen -

You are already working on a platform that several people have helped to build. If you want to take it to extremes, might as go all the way and program your own DAW, engineer your own synths, design your own operating system, etc.

Depending on what DAW you use, it will influence you to work in certain ways and every DAW has it's own limitations. If you really wanted to free yourself you would have to make your own.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by dj_alfi change your avatar for fucks sake.

quote:

Originally posted by Beatflux I think producing is a lot like dancing in that it takes a while before you can produce with your own unique style. When you start out, you're not really trying to completely reinvent the wheel; you probably copy someone very influential and as you go along you pick up new and different techniques. You keeps the ones you like, and drop the ones you don't. At the end you have something unique that is totally your own. Stephen - You are already working on a platform that several people have helped to build. If you want to take it to extremes, might as go all the way and program your own DAW, engineer your own synths, design your own operating system, etc. Depending on what DAW you use, it will influence you to work in certain ways and every DAW has it's own limitations. If you really wanted to free yourself you would have to make your own.

That's quite a stretch there dude. Irrational to say the least - re-read the OP more carefully and maybe you ill see what I'm trying to get at.

It's just a two part question. No need to bring up something that will never be done.

Knowledge is power. It's the producers inproper execution of the knowledge that is the problem.

quote:

Originally posted by DjStephenWiley At first, this sounds really dumb, but I think we can all agree that music is beyond stagnant, and one of the reasons is because everybody wants to do what everybody is doing. Well, what if we just quit trying to learn the tricks from others and spent hard work making our own? Wouldn't that help to diversify our music (which is needed badly)) ?

You don't think the design of synths and DAWs has an affect on how people make music? When you use synths and DAWs you're using someone else's ideas on what a DAW or synth should be like. You're working the way they think you should work.

Using someone else's idea is using someone else's ideas.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by dj_alfi change your avatar for fucks sake.

One of the major comments I get on all my tracks is that its different, and it probably has to do with the fact that Ive heard alot less music than one would think. I'm not the guy who gets every album from every artist and blasts through them, and goes to clubs and gets exposed to a clusterfuck of music. My entier music collection is about 4 gigs of mp3s... ranging from pretty much every genra there is, you do the math. And I also rarely take advice from others thats not technical. In that reguard Id say it helped, of course now there is the simple fact that most of my music is niche...doesn't appeal to any mass of people. It won't make me famous or make me money. Unless one of my tracks magicly starts a forest fire in the music industry....unlikely.

/advert

Oh and btw, on linux, you can design your own daw :P I know about 4 DAWs right now on linux, all open source, you can modify them to your hearts content.

/advert

___________________
E = mc²/2

E = mc² is the optical illusion of E = mc²/2

Click me to find out why.

Last edited by sixofour.604 on Sep-08-2009 at 20:01

quote:

Originally posted by Beatflux You don't think the design of synths and DAWs has an affect on how people make music? When you use synths and DAWs you're using someone else's ideas on what a DAW or synth should be like. You're working the way they think you should work. Using someone else's idea is using someone else's ideas.

Synths and DAW's are tools, Are you saying using a ratchet or a crescent wrench for construction is oblique intented because somebody else created the tool? the end result tells all. I love unique sounding tunes, and i also love formulaic rollercoasters a la Airbase. If your productions sound like a direct rip off, then your subject to scrutinization and harsh criticism. I personally like pushing the envelopes the top producers hammer, for a more original sound.

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by DJ RANN Dude, music is only second to beer in allowing ugly people to have sex.

Personally I started making my own style and didnt think much about the rest. That resulted in many shitty songs that only my closest buddies have heard.

Now when I now what I want Ive been looking on the different parts I need to get better. So even if I copy or get inspired by some things the ground is always mine.

The learning curve probably gets longer but Ive always wanted my own sound so this was the only right thing to do in my case.

Cant say I dont listen to peoples advise though, that would be foolish IMO

I think in the beginning...maybe the first few years of
producing is ok...but once you know what your doing...
its time to go your own path...time to ween yourself
off the pros.

No need to go sounding all weird and artsy though...